linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: Yueyang Pan <pyyjason@gmail.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/show_mem: Bug fix for print mem alloc info
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 12:51:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK9htWRehfJDLFJD@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1756318426.git.pyyjason@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 11:34:21AM -0700, Yueyang Pan wrote:
> This patch set fixes two issues we saw in production rollout. 
> 
> The first issue is that we saw all zero output of memory allocation 
> profiling information from show_mem() if CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING 
> is set and sysctl.vm.mem_profiling=0. In this case, the behaviour 
> should be the same as when CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING is unset, 

Did you mean to say when sysctl.vm.mem_profiling=never?

My understanding is that setting the sysctl=0 Pauses memory allocation
profiling, while 1 Resumes it. When the sysctl=never should be the same
as when the config is unset, but I suspect we might still want the info
when set to 0.

> where show_mem prints nothing about the information. This will make 
> further parse easier as we don't have to differentiate what a all 
> zero line actually means (Does it mean  0 bytes are allocated 
> or simply memory allocation profiling is disabled).
> 
> The second issue is that multiple entities can call show_mem() 
> which messed up the allocation info in dmesg. We saw outputs like this:  
> ```
>     327 MiB    83635 mm/compaction.c:1880 func:compaction_alloc
>    48.4 GiB 12684937 mm/memory.c:1061 func:folio_prealloc
>    7.48 GiB    10899 mm/huge_memory.c:1159 func:vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd
>     298 MiB    95216 kernel/fork.c:318 func:alloc_thread_stack_node
>     250 MiB    63901 mm/zsmalloc.c:987 func:alloc_zspage
>     1.42 GiB   372527 mm/memory.c:1063 func:folio_prealloc
>     1.17 GiB    95693 mm/slub.c:2424 func:alloc_slab_page
>      651 MiB   166732 mm/readahead.c:270 func:page_cache_ra_unbounded
>      419 MiB   107261 net/core/page_pool.c:572 func:__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow
>      404 MiB   103425 arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:25 func:pte_alloc_one
> ```
> The above example is because one kthread invokes show_mem() 
> from __alloc_pages_slowpath while kernel itself calls 
> oom_kill_process()

I'm not familiar with show_mem(). Could you spell out what's wrong with
the output above?

> Yueyang Pan (2):
>   mm/show_mem: No print when not mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()
>   mm/show_mem: Add trylock while printing alloc info
> 
>  mm/show_mem.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-27 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 18:34 [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/show_mem: Bug fix for print mem alloc info Yueyang Pan
2025-08-27 18:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/show_mem: No print when not mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() Yueyang Pan
2025-08-27 18:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/show_mem: Add trylock while printing alloc info Yueyang Pan
2025-08-27 22:06   ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-27 22:28     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-08-28  8:36       ` Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28  8:34     ` Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28  8:41       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28  8:47         ` Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28  8:53           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28  9:51             ` Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28  9:54               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 22:10                 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28 16:35         ` Shakeel Butt
2025-08-28 17:21           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-27 19:51 ` Vishal Moola (Oracle) [this message]
2025-08-28  8:29   ` [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/show_mem: Bug fix for print mem " Yueyang Pan
2025-08-28 17:05     ` Vishal Moola (Oracle)
2025-08-28 22:07       ` Yueyang Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aK9htWRehfJDLFJD@fedora \
    --to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pyyjason@gmail.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).