public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove PMD alignment constraint in execmem_vmalloc()
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:33:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMvf_R4ttLibbnQ1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918093453.75676-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 03:04:53PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> When using vmalloc with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP flag, it will set the alignment
> to PMD_SIZE internally, if it deems huge mappings to be eligible.
> Therefore, setting the alignment in execmem_vmalloc is redundant. Apart
> from this, it also reduces the probability of allocation in case vmalloc
> fails to allocate hugepages - in the fallback case, vmalloc tries to use
> the original alignment and allocate basepages, which unfortunately will
> again be PMD_SIZE passed over from execmem_vmalloc, thus constraining
> the search for a free space in vmalloc region.
> 
> Therefore, remove this constraint.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>

> ---
> mm-selftests pass, but I am not sure if they touch execmem code, and I
> have no experience with this code.
> 
>  mm/execmem.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/execmem.c b/mm/execmem.c
> index 0822305413ec..810a4ba9c924 100644
> --- a/mm/execmem.c
> +++ b/mm/execmem.c
> @@ -38,9 +38,6 @@ static void *execmem_vmalloc(struct execmem_range *range, size_t size,
>  	if (kasan)
>  		vm_flags |= VM_DEFER_KMEMLEAK;
>  
> -	if (vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)
> -		align = PMD_SIZE;
> -
>  	p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, align, start, end, gfp_flags,
>  				 pgprot, vm_flags, NUMA_NO_NODE,
>  				 __builtin_return_address(0));
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18  9:34 [PATCH] mm: Remove PMD alignment constraint in execmem_vmalloc() Dev Jain
2025-09-18 10:33 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-09-18 13:06   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-09-21  7:39     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-22  6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-22  6:50   ` Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMvf_R4ttLibbnQ1@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox