linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	FirstName LastName <vannapurve@google.com>,
	ackerleytng@google.com,  aik@amd.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
	david@redhat.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,  kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	liam.merwick@oracle.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: guest_memfd: GUP source pages prior to populating guest memory
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:30:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTjNLdxvmAMuo7VG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5649e224-bb6a-4b63-bb27-5541216df0b6@suse.cz>

On Mon, Dec 08, 2025, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/4/25 00:12, Michael Roth wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 08:59:10PM +0000, FirstName LastName wrote:
> >> 
> >> e.g. 4K page based population logic will keep things simple and can be
> >> further simplified if we can add PAGE_ALIGNED(params.uaddr) restriction.
> > 
> > I'm still hesitant to pull the trigger on retroactively enforcing
> > page-aligned uaddr for SNP, but if the maintainers are good with it then
> > no objection from me.
> 
> IMHO it would be for the best. If there are no known users that would break,
> it's worth trying. The "do not break userspace" rule isn't about eliminating
> any theoretical possibility, but indeed about known breakages (and reacting
> appropriately to reports about previously unknown breakages). Perhaps any
> such users would be also willing to adjust and not demand a revert.

+1.  This code is already crazy complex, we should jump at any simplification
possible.  Especially since we expect in-place conversion to dominate usage in
the future, and in-place conversion is incompatible with an unaligned source.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-10  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-13 23:07 [PATCH RFC 0/3] KVM: guest_memfd: Rework preparation/population flows in prep for in-place conversion Michael Roth
2025-11-13 23:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: guest_memfd: Remove preparation tracking Michael Roth
2025-11-17 23:58   ` Ackerley Tng
2025-11-19  0:18     ` Michael Roth
2025-11-20  9:12   ` Yan Zhao
2025-11-21 12:43     ` Michael Roth
2025-11-25  3:13       ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-01  1:35         ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-01  2:51           ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-01 19:33             ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-02  9:16               ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-01 23:44         ` Michael Roth
2025-12-02  9:17           ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-03 13:47             ` Michael Roth
2025-12-05  3:54               ` Yan Zhao
2025-11-13 23:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: TDX: Document alignment requirements for KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION Michael Roth
2025-11-13 23:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: guest_memfd: GUP source pages prior to populating guest memory Michael Roth
2025-11-20  9:11   ` Yan Zhao
2025-11-21 13:01     ` Michael Roth
2025-11-24  9:31       ` Yan Zhao
2025-11-24 15:53         ` Ira Weiny
2025-11-25  3:12           ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-01  1:47         ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-01 21:03           ` Michael Roth
2025-12-01 22:13         ` Michael Roth
2025-12-03  2:46           ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-03 14:26             ` Michael Roth
2025-12-03 20:59               ` FirstName LastName
2025-12-03 23:12                 ` Michael Roth
2025-12-08 11:07                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-10  1:30                     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-12-03 21:01               ` Ira Weiny
2025-12-03 23:07                 ` Michael Roth
2025-12-05  3:38               ` Yan Zhao
2025-12-01  1:44       ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-12-03 23:48         ` Michael Roth
2025-11-20 19:34   ` Ira Weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTjNLdxvmAMuo7VG@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).