From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: zone lock tracepoint instrumentation
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 20:45:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa8xawMxLeUjkyHx@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309151317.7bba06dd@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:13:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The biggest issue with making a generic light weight LOCK_STAT is that
> locks are extremely optimized. Any addition of generic lock encoding will
> cause a noticeable overhead when compiled in, even when disabled.
I'm not sure that's true. Taking the current Debian kernel config
leads to a "call" instruction to acquire a spinlock:
void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval)
{
struct hlist_head *b = inode_hashtable + hash(inode->i_sb, hashval);
spin_lock(&inode_hash_lock);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&inode->i_hash, b);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
}
compiles to:
[...]
280: 23 35 00 00 00 00 and 0x0(%rip),%esi # 286 <__insert_inode_hash+0x56>
282: R_X86_64_PC32 .data..ro_after_init+0x10
286: 48 8d 2c f0 lea (%rax,%rsi,8),%rbp
28a: e8 00 00 00 00 call 28f <__insert_inode_hash+0x5f>
28b: R_X86_64_PLT32 _raw_spin_lock-0x4
28f: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi
292: e8 00 00 00 00 call 297 <__insert_inode_hash+0x67>
293: R_X86_64_PLT32 _raw_spin_lock-0x4
[...]
Debian doesn't do anything too weird here:
#
# Lock Debugging (spinlocks, mutexes, etc...)
#
CONFIG_LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not set
# CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS is not set
# CONFIG_LOCK_TORTURE_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SELFTEST is not set
# CONFIG_SCF_TORTURE_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG is not set
(The spinlock code is too complex for me to follow what config options
influence whether it's a function call; you probably have enough of it
in your head that you'd know)
> The other issue is the data we store for the lock. A lock is usually just a
> word (or long) in size, embedded in a structure. LOCKDEP and LOCK_STAT adds
> a key per lock. This increases the data size of the kernel.
It does, but perhaps for a light weight lockstat, we could do better
than that. For example it could use the return address to look up
which lock is being accessed rather than embedding a key in each lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 16:00 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: zone lock tracepoint instrumentation Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm: introduce zone lock wrappers Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 20:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-28 1:13 ` Zi Yan
2026-02-28 16:23 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-02 13:34 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-27 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm: convert zone lock users to wrappers Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 20:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-02 15:22 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-28 1:14 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-02 13:42 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-27 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm: convert compaction to zone lock wrappers Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 20:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-28 1:16 ` Zi Yan
2026-02-28 16:31 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-02 14:02 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-02-27 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: rename zone->lock to zone->_lock Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 20:40 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-28 1:17 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-02 14:10 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-02 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-03 14:25 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 1:50 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-04 13:01 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 15:13 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-04 15:17 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-05 9:27 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-05 14:55 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-05 18:16 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-05 18:59 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-06 1:20 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-06 8:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-06 10:30 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-02-27 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm: add tracepoints for zone lock Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-02-27 19:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-02 15:18 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-02 14:16 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] mm: zone lock tracepoint instrumentation Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-09 14:21 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-09 14:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-09 19:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-09 20:45 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2026-03-09 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-16 17:40 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-19 13:22 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-24 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-25 12:14 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-25 14:19 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa8xawMxLeUjkyHx@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox