From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: shivamkalra98@zohomail.in
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 07:59:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abJydalLnoddywQq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309-vmalloc-shrink-v3-2-5590fd8de2eb@zohomail.in>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 05:25:46PM +0530, Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
>
> When vrealloc() shrinks an allocation and the new size crosses a page
> boundary, unmap and free the tail pages that are no longer needed. This
> reclaims physical memory that was previously wasted for the lifetime
> of the allocation.
>
> The heuristic is simple: always free when at least one full page becomes
> unused. Huge page allocations (page_order > 0) are skipped, as partial
> freeing would require splitting.
>
> The virtual address reservation (vm->size / vmap_area) is intentionally
> kept unchanged, preserving the address for potential future grow-in-place
> support.
>
> Fix the grow-in-place check to compare against vm->nr_pages rather than
> get_vm_area_size(), since the latter reflects the virtual reservation
> which does not shrink. Without this fix, a grow after shrink would
> access freed pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 42ae68450a90..114e0bd1030e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -4344,14 +4344,23 @@ void *vrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align
> goto need_realloc;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: Shrink the vm_area, i.e. unmap and free unused pages. What
> - * would be a good heuristic for when to shrink the vm_area?
> - */
> if (size <= old_size) {
> + unsigned int new_nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> /* Zero out "freed" memory, potentially for future realloc. */
> if (want_init_on_free() || want_init_on_alloc(flags))
> memset((void *)p + size, 0, old_size - size);
> +
> + /* Free tail pages when shrink crosses a page boundary. */
> + if (new_nr_pages < vm->nr_pages && !vm_area_page_order(vm)) {
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p;
> +
> + vunmap_range(addr + (new_nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT),
> + addr + (vm->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
> +
> + vmalloc_free_pages(vm, new_nr_pages, vm->nr_pages);
This leaves the range vm->pages[new_nr_pages .. old_nr_pages] with
non-NULL but freed page pointers. It seems less error prone to set those
entries of vm->pages to NULL here.
Note that it's not a problem for existing usage of vmalloc_free_pages(),
because it is immediately followed by kvfree(vm->pages).
Alice
> + vm->nr_pages = new_nr_pages;
> + }
> vm->requested_size = size;
> kasan_vrealloc(p, old_size, size);
> return (void *)p;
> @@ -4360,7 +4369,7 @@ void *vrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align
> /*
> * We already have the bytes available in the allocation; use them.
> */
> - if (size <= alloced_size) {
> + if (size <= (size_t)vm->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) {
> /*
> * No need to zero memory here, as unused memory will have
> * already been zeroed at initial allocation time or during
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 11:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-09 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/vmalloc: extract vmalloc_free_pages() helper from vfree() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-11 17:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-03-14 7:00 ` Shivam Kalra
2026-03-09 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-12 7:59 ` Alice Ryhl [this message]
2026-03-14 7:01 ` Shivam Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abJydalLnoddywQq@google.com \
--to=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shivamkalra98@zohomail.in \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox