public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] arch/powerpc: don't initialize kasan if it's disabled
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:10:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abi4Gumt0Qr_h-3W@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bc30137-3f1d-4a4a-8573-8f26866fcc26@kernel.org>

On 03/12/26 at 12:23pm, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 12/03/2026 à 12:12, Sourabh Jain a écrit :
> > 
> > 
> > On 25/02/26 13:44, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > Here, kasan is disabled if specified 'kasan=off' in kernel cmdline.
> > > 
> > > This includes 32bit, book3s/64 and book3e/64.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > ---
> > >   arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c        | 6 +++++-
> > >   arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c | 4 ++++
> > >   arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c | 4 ++++
> > >   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/ init_32.c
> > > index 1d083597464f..0ea2a636c992 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > @@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > >       u64 i;
> > >       int ret;
> > > +    /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > +    if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > +        return;
> > > +
> > >       for_each_mem_range(i, &base, &end) {
> > >           phys_addr_t top = min(end, total_lowmem);
> > > @@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > >   void __init kasan_late_init(void)
> > >   {
> > > -    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC))
> > > +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC) && kasan_enabled())
> > >           kasan_unmap_early_shadow_vmalloc();
> > >   }
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/ kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > index 0d3a73d6d4b0..fbe4c9a7e460 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > @@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > >       u64 i;
> > >       pte_t zero_pte = pfn_pte(virt_to_pfn(kasan_early_shadow_page),
> > > PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
> > > +    /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > +    if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > +        return;
> > > +
> > >       for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end)
> > >           kasan_init_phys_region(phys_to_virt(start), phys_to_virt(end));
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/ kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > index dcafa641804c..f7906f9ef9be 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > >       u64 i;
> > >       pte_t zero_pte = pfn_pte(virt_to_pfn(kasan_early_shadow_page),
> > > PAGE_KERNEL);
> > > +    /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > +    if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > +        return;
> > > +
> > >       if (!early_radix_enabled()) {
> > >           pr_warn("KASAN not enabled as it requires radix!");
> > >           return;
> > 
> > Should we log in the kernel log buffer that KASAN is disabled?
> > 
> > Right now, I don't see the kernel advertising the same.
> 
> When KASAN is enabled it is advertised with:
> 
> 	pr_info("KernelAddressSanitizer initialized (generic)\n");
> 
> Isn't the absence of that message enough to understand KASAN is not there ?

Right, that's the way I took when I tested it.

> 
> > 
> > $ dmesg | grep -i kasan
> > [    0.000000] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=(ieee1275//vdevice/v-
> > scsi@30000070/disk@8100000000000000,msdos2)/vmlinuz-7.0.0-rc3+
> > crashkernel=2G kasan=off
> > 
> > Tested this series on powerpc Pseries platform.
> > So feel free to add:
> > Tested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks for testing.



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25  8:13 [PATCH v5 00/15] mm/kasan: make kasan=on|off work for all three modes Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:13 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] mm/kasan: add conditional checks in functions to return directly if kasan is disabled Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:13 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] mm/kasan: rename 'kasan_arg' to 'kasan_arg_disabled' Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] mm/kasan: mm/kasan: move kasan= code to common place Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] mm/kasan: make kasan=on|off take effect for all three modes Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] mm/kasan/sw_tags: don't initialize kasan if it's disabled Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] arch/arm: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] arch/arm64: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] arch/loongarch: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] arch/powerpc: " Baoquan He
2026-03-12 11:12   ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-12 11:23     ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-17  2:10       ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-03-17  2:39       ` Sourabh Jain
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] arch/riscv: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] arch/x86: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] arch/xtensa: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] arch/um: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] mm/kasan: add document into kernel-parameters.txt Baoquan He
2026-03-12 12:53   ` Samuel Holland
2026-03-17  3:36     ` Baoquan He
2026-03-17  3:49       ` Samuel Holland
2026-02-25  8:14 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] mm/kasan: clean up unneeded ARCH_DEFER_KASAN and kasan_arch_is_ready Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abi4Gumt0Qr_h-3W@fedora \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox