From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com,
dvyukov@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, chris@zankel.net, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] arch/powerpc: don't initialize kasan if it's disabled
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:10:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abi4Gumt0Qr_h-3W@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bc30137-3f1d-4a4a-8573-8f26866fcc26@kernel.org>
On 03/12/26 at 12:23pm, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote:
>
>
> Le 12/03/2026 à 12:12, Sourabh Jain a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On 25/02/26 13:44, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > Here, kasan is disabled if specified 'kasan=off' in kernel cmdline.
> > >
> > > This includes 32bit, book3s/64 and book3e/64.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > ---
> > > arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c | 6 +++++-
> > > arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c | 4 ++++
> > > arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/ init_32.c
> > > index 1d083597464f..0ea2a636c992 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
> > > @@ -141,6 +141,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > > u64 i;
> > > int ret;
> > > + /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > + if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > for_each_mem_range(i, &base, &end) {
> > > phys_addr_t top = min(end, total_lowmem);
> > > @@ -170,7 +174,7 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > > void __init kasan_late_init(void)
> > > {
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC))
> > > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC) && kasan_enabled())
> > > kasan_unmap_early_shadow_vmalloc();
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/ kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > index 0d3a73d6d4b0..fbe4c9a7e460 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3e_64.c
> > > @@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > > u64 i;
> > > pte_t zero_pte = pfn_pte(virt_to_pfn(kasan_early_shadow_page),
> > > PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
> > > + /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > + if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end)
> > > kasan_init_phys_region(phys_to_virt(start), phys_to_virt(end));
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/mm/ kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > index dcafa641804c..f7906f9ef9be 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_book3s_64.c
> > > @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
> > > u64 i;
> > > pte_t zero_pte = pfn_pte(virt_to_pfn(kasan_early_shadow_page),
> > > PAGE_KERNEL);
> > > + /* If KASAN is disabled via command line, don't initialize it. */
> > > + if (kasan_arg_disabled)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > if (!early_radix_enabled()) {
> > > pr_warn("KASAN not enabled as it requires radix!");
> > > return;
> >
> > Should we log in the kernel log buffer that KASAN is disabled?
> >
> > Right now, I don't see the kernel advertising the same.
>
> When KASAN is enabled it is advertised with:
>
> pr_info("KernelAddressSanitizer initialized (generic)\n");
>
> Isn't the absence of that message enough to understand KASAN is not there ?
Right, that's the way I took when I tested it.
>
> >
> > $ dmesg | grep -i kasan
> > [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=(ieee1275//vdevice/v-
> > scsi@30000070/disk@8100000000000000,msdos2)/vmlinuz-7.0.0-rc3+
> > crashkernel=2G kasan=off
> >
> > Tested this series on powerpc Pseries platform.
> > So feel free to add:
> > Tested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for testing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-25 8:13 [PATCH v5 00/15] mm/kasan: make kasan=on|off work for all three modes Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] mm/kasan: add conditional checks in functions to return directly if kasan is disabled Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:13 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] mm/kasan: rename 'kasan_arg' to 'kasan_arg_disabled' Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] mm/kasan: mm/kasan: move kasan= code to common place Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] mm/kasan: make kasan=on|off take effect for all three modes Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] mm/kasan/sw_tags: don't initialize kasan if it's disabled Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] arch/arm: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] arch/arm64: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] arch/loongarch: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] arch/powerpc: " Baoquan He
2026-03-12 11:12 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-03-12 11:23 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-17 2:10 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2026-03-17 2:39 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] arch/riscv: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] arch/x86: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] arch/xtensa: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] arch/um: " Baoquan He
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] mm/kasan: add document into kernel-parameters.txt Baoquan He
2026-03-12 12:53 ` Samuel Holland
2026-03-17 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2026-03-17 3:49 ` Samuel Holland
2026-02-25 8:14 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] mm/kasan: clean up unneeded ARCH_DEFER_KASAN and kasan_arch_is_ready Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abi4Gumt0Qr_h-3W@fedora \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox