[PATCH 0/3] mm/memcontrol: control demotion in memcg reclaim

[PATCH 0/3] mm/memcontrol: control demotion in memcg reclaim

[Bing Jiao]

In tiered-memory systems, NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets
in shrink_folio_list(), but it does not reduce the total memory usage of
a memcg.

In memcg direct reclaim paths (charge-triggered or manual limit writes),
this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim loop concludes it has
satisfied the memory request without actually reducing the cgroup's charge.
This results in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all pages
to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills, and potentially
premature OOM kills when the cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion
is still possible.

This series fixes this issue by disabling demotion in memcg-specific
direct reclaim paths and provides user control for proactive reclaim.

Patch 1: Fixes a state leak in try_charge_memcg() where reclaim_options
were modified and carried over to retries improperly.

Patch 2: Introduces MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION and disables demotion in
memcg direct reclaim paths.

Patch 3: Adds a 'demote=' option to the proactive reclaim interface
(memory.reclaim), allowing users to explicitly enable demotion if
desired, while defaulting it to disabled for consistency.

Bing Jiao (3):
  mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()
  mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim
  mm/vmscan: add demote= option to proactive reclaim

 include/linux/swap.h |  1 +
 mm/memcontrol-v1.c   | 10 ++++++++--
 mm/memcontrol.c      | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 mm/vmscan.c          | 11 +++++++++++
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

[PATCH 1/3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Bing Jiao]

In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
(e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
persist into subsequent retries.

This could lead to incorrect reclaim behavior, such as anon pages
cannot be reclaimed if memsw has quotas after retries.

Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.

Fixes: 73b73bac90d9 ("mm: vmpressure: don't count proactive reclaim in vmpressure")
Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	struct page_counter *counter;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool passed_oom = false;
-	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options;
 	bool drained = false;
 	bool raised_max_event = false;
 	unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;

+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Yosry Ahmed]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 4:07 PM Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com> wrote:
>
> In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> persist into subsequent retries.
>
> This could lead to incorrect reclaim behavior, such as anon pages
> cannot be reclaimed if memsw has quotas after retries.
>
> Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
> retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.
>
> Fixes: 73b73bac90d9 ("mm: vmpressure: don't count proactive reclaim in vmpressure")

Before this commit, we had the same logic with 'may_swap' being
initialized to true and set to false in the retry loop. Before that,
it was 'flags' and 'MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP'.

I think initializing whether to swap or not outside the retry loop
started by commit 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold
mem_cgroup_do_charge()") 12 years ago, so I don't think it's a problem
in practice.

Practically speaking, we clear MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP if we hit the
combined memcg->memsw limit. I guess it's theoretically possible (but
probably unlikely) that we try to charge memcg->memsw, fail, reclaim
and/or OOM, then try again, succeed in charging memcg->memsw, but fail
charging memcg->memory. In this case, we should indeed attempt to
swap.

All that being said, this looks correct with the right 'Fixes' tag:

Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>

> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>         struct page_counter *counter;
>         unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
>         bool passed_oom = false;
> -       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options;
>         bool drained = false;
>         bool raised_max_event = false;
>         unsigned long pflags;
> @@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>                 /* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
>                 batch = nr_pages;
>
> +       reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
>         if (!do_memsw_account() ||
>             page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
>                 if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> --
> 2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
>

[PATCH 2/3] mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim

[Bing Jiao]

NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets in shrink_folio_list(), but
it does not reduce the total memory usage of a memcg. In memcg direct
reclaim paths (e.g., charge-triggered or manual limit writes), where
demotion is allowed, this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim
loop concludes it has satisfied the memory request without actually
reducing the cgroup's charge.

This could result in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all
pages to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills when the
cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion is still possible.

Introduce the MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION flag to disable demotion in
these memcg-specific reclaim paths. This ensures that reclaim
progress is only counted when memory is actually freed or swapped out.

Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
---
 include/linux/swap.h |  1 +
 mm/memcontrol-v1.c   | 10 ++++++++--
 mm/memcontrol.c      | 16 +++++++++++-----
 mm/vmscan.c          |  1 +
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 7a09df6977a5..e83897a6dc72 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone

 #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
 #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
+#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION (1 << 3)
 #define MIN_SWAPPINESS 0
 #define MAX_SWAPPINESS 200

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
index 433bba9dfe71..3cb600e28e5b 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
@@ -1466,6 +1466,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	int ret;
 	bool limits_invariant;
 	struct page_counter *counter = memsw ? &memcg->memsw : &memcg->memory;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
+
+	if (!memsw)
+		reclaim_options |= MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;

 	do {
 		if (signal_pending(current)) {
@@ -1500,7 +1504,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		}

 		if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
-				memsw ? 0 : MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL)) {
+						 reclaim_options, NULL)) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -1520,6 +1524,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
+				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;

 	/* we call try-to-free pages for make this cgroup empty */
 	lru_add_drain_all();
@@ -1532,7 +1538,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 			return -EINTR;

 		if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
-						  MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
+						  reclaim_options, NULL))
 			nr_retries--;
 	}

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 303ac622d22d..fcf1cd0da643 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2287,6 +2287,8 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				  gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
+				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;

 	do {
 		unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2300,7 +2302,7 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
 		nr_reclaimed += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages,
 							gfp_mask,
-							MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP,
+							reclaim_options,
 							NULL);
 		psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
 	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
@@ -2572,7 +2574,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;

-	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
@@ -2610,7 +2612,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,

 	psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
 	nr_reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem_over_limit, nr_pages,
-						    gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
+					gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
 	psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);

 	if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
@@ -4638,6 +4640,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
 	unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
+				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
 	bool drained = false;
 	unsigned long high;
 	int err;
@@ -4669,7 +4673,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 		}

 		reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - high,
-					GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL);
+					GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL);

 		if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
 			break;
@@ -4690,6 +4694,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
 	unsigned int nr_reclaims = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
+				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
 	bool drained = false;
 	unsigned long max;
 	int err;
@@ -4721,7 +4727,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,

 		if (nr_reclaims) {
 			if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - max,
-					GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
+					GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL))
 				nr_reclaims--;
 			continue;
 		}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 33287ba4a500..7a8617ba1748 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -6809,6 +6809,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
 		.may_swap = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP),
 		.proactive = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE),
+		.no_demotion = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION),
 	};
 	/*
 	 * Traverse the ZONELIST_FALLBACK zonelist of the current node to put
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim

[Yosry Ahmed]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 4:07 PM Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com> wrote:
>
> NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets in shrink_folio_list(), but
> it does not reduce the total memory usage of a memcg. In memcg direct
> reclaim paths (e.g., charge-triggered or manual limit writes), where
> demotion is allowed, this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim
> loop concludes it has satisfied the memory request without actually
> reducing the cgroup's charge.
>
> This could result in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all
> pages to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills when the
> cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion is still possible.
>
> Introduce the MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION flag to disable demotion in
> these memcg-specific reclaim paths. This ensures that reclaim
> progress is only counted when memory is actually freed or swapped out.

See the discussion @
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250909012141.1467-1-cuishw@inspur.com/
and the commits/threads it is referring to.

>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h |  1 +
>  mm/memcontrol-v1.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>  mm/memcontrol.c      | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  mm/vmscan.c          |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 7a09df6977a5..e83897a6dc72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone
>
>  #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
>  #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
> +#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION (1 << 3)
>  #define MIN_SWAPPINESS 0
>  #define MAX_SWAPPINESS 200
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> index 433bba9dfe71..3cb600e28e5b 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>         int ret;
>         bool limits_invariant;
>         struct page_counter *counter = memsw ? &memcg->memsw : &memcg->memory;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
> +
> +       if (!memsw)
> +               reclaim_options |= MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
>
>         do {
>                 if (signal_pending(current)) {
> @@ -1500,7 +1504,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                 }
>
>                 if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> -                               memsw ? 0 : MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL)) {
> +                                                reclaim_options, NULL)) {
>                         ret = -EBUSY;
>                         break;
>                 }
> @@ -1520,6 +1524,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
>         int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +                                      MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>
>         /* we call try-to-free pages for make this cgroup empty */
>         lru_add_drain_all();
> @@ -1532,7 +1538,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                         return -EINTR;
>
>                 if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> -                                                 MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
> +                                                 reclaim_options, NULL))
>                         nr_retries--;
>         }
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 303ac622d22d..fcf1cd0da643 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2287,6 +2287,8 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                                   gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
>         unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +                                      MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>
>         do {
>                 unsigned long pflags;
> @@ -2300,7 +2302,7 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                 psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
>                 nr_reclaimed += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages,
>                                                         gfp_mask,
> -                                                       MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP,
> +                                                       reclaim_options,
>                                                         NULL);
>                 psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>         } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
> @@ -2572,7 +2574,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>                 /* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
>                 batch = nr_pages;
>
> -       reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> +       reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>         if (!do_memsw_account() ||
>             page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
>                 if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> @@ -2610,7 +2612,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>
>         psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
>         nr_reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem_over_limit, nr_pages,
> -                                                   gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
> +                                       gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
>         psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>
>         if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> @@ -4638,6 +4640,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  {
>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>         unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +                                      MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>         bool drained = false;
>         unsigned long high;
>         int err;
> @@ -4669,7 +4673,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>                 }
>
>                 reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - high,
> -                                       GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL);
> +                                       GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL);
>
>                 if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
>                         break;
> @@ -4690,6 +4694,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  {
>         struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>         unsigned int nr_reclaims = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +       unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +                                      MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>         bool drained = false;
>         unsigned long max;
>         int err;
> @@ -4721,7 +4727,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>
>                 if (nr_reclaims) {
>                         if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - max,
> -                                       GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
> +                                       GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL))
>                                 nr_reclaims--;
>                         continue;
>                 }
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 33287ba4a500..7a8617ba1748 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -6809,6 +6809,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                 .may_unmap = 1,
>                 .may_swap = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP),
>                 .proactive = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE),
> +               .no_demotion = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION),
>         };
>         /*
>          * Traverse the ZONELIST_FALLBACK zonelist of the current node to put
> --
> 2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
>

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim

[Bing Jiao]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 04:44:34PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 4:07 PM Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets in shrink_folio_list(), but
> > it does not reduce the total memory usage of a memcg. In memcg direct
> > reclaim paths (e.g., charge-triggered or manual limit writes), where
> > demotion is allowed, this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim
> > loop concludes it has satisfied the memory request without actually
> > reducing the cgroup's charge.
> >
> > This could result in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all
> > pages to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills when the
> > cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion is still possible.
> >
> > Introduce the MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION flag to disable demotion in
> > these memcg-specific reclaim paths. This ensures that reclaim
> > progress is only counted when memory is actually freed or swapped out.
>
> See the discussion @
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250909012141.1467-1-cuishw@inspur.com/
> and the commits/threads it is referring to.

Hi Yosry,

Thanks for pointing it out! I was unaware of the previous discussion
regarding demotion as aging progress.

I will drop patches 2 and 3 from this series and resubmit patch 1 as
a standalone fix by replying to this thread.

Thanks,
Bing

[PATCH v2] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Bing Jiao]

In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
(e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
persist into subsequent retries.

This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
prevents it.

Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.

Fixes: 73b73bac90d9 ("mm: vmpressure: don't count proactive reclaim in vmpressure")
Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- Dropped other patches.
- Refined commit message to clarify the impact of the leak (Yosry).
- Added Reviewed-by tag.

 mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	struct page_counter *counter;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool passed_oom = false;
-	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options;
 	bool drained = false;
 	bool raised_max_event = false;
 	unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;

+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Yosry Ahmed]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 2:56 PM Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com> wrote:
>
> In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> persist into subsequent retries.
>
> This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> prevents it.
>
> Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
> retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.
>
> Fixes: 73b73bac90d9 ("mm: vmpressure: don't count proactive reclaim in vmpressure")

The Fixes tag is still wrong, see my previous reply.

[PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Bing Jiao]

In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
(e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
persist into subsequent retries.

This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
prevents it.

Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.

Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
---
v3:
- Corrected the Fixes tag (Yosry).

 mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	struct page_counter *counter;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool passed_oom = false;
-	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options;
 	bool drained = false;
 	bool raised_max_event = false;
 	unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;

+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Johannes Weiner]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 10:19:46PM +0000, Bing Jiao wrote:
> In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> persist into subsequent retries.
> 
> This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> prevents it.
> 
> Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
> retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.
> 
> Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Shakeel Butt]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 10:19:46PM +0000, Bing Jiao wrote:
> In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> persist into subsequent retries.
> 
> This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> prevents it.
> 
> Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
> retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.
> 
> Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 18-03-26 22:19:46, Bing Jiao wrote:
> In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> persist into subsequent retries.
> 
> This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> prevents it.

Have you noticed this happening in practice or is this based on the code
reading?
 
> Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
> retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.
> 
> Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!

> ---
> v3:
> - Corrected the Fixes tag (Yosry).
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  	struct page_counter *counter;
>  	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
>  	bool passed_oom = false;
> -	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options;
>  	bool drained = false;
>  	bool raised_max_event = false;
>  	unsigned long pflags;
> @@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>  		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
>  		batch = nr_pages;
> 
> +	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
>  	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
>  	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
>  		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> --
> 2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Bing Jiao]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 18-03-26 22:19:46, Bing Jiao wrote:
> > In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> > once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> > retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> > (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> > persist into subsequent retries.
> >
> > This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> > MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> > is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> > successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> > In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> > prevents it.
>
> Have you noticed this happening in practice or is this based on the code
> reading?

Hi, Michal, thanks for the ack.

This issue was identified during code reading, when I was analyzing
the memsw limit behavior in try_charge_memcg(); specifically how
retries are handled when demotion is disabled (the demotion patch
itself was dropped).

Best,
Bing

Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Michal Hocko]

On Fri 20-03-26 03:39:40, Bing Jiao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 18-03-26 22:19:46, Bing Jiao wrote:
> > > In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
> > > once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
> > > retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
> > > (e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
> > > persist into subsequent retries.
> > >
> > > This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
> > > MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
> > > is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
> > > successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
> > > In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
> > > prevents it.
> >
> > Have you noticed this happening in practice or is this based on the code
> > reading?
> 
> Hi, Michal, thanks for the ack.
> 
> This issue was identified during code reading, when I was analyzing
> the memsw limit behavior in try_charge_memcg(); specifically how
> retries are handled when demotion is disabled (the demotion patch
> itself was dropped).

OK, that is always good to clarify in the changelog.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

[PATCH v4] mm/memcontrol: fix reclaim_options leak in try_charge_memcg()

[Bing Jiao]

In try_charge_memcg(), the 'reclaim_options' variable is initialized
once at the start of the function. However, the function contains a
retry loop. If reclaim_options were modified during an iteration
(e.g., by encountering a memsw limit), the modified state would
persist into subsequent retries.

This leads to incorrect reclaim behavior. Specifically,
MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP is cleared when the combined memcg->memsw limit
is reached. After reclaimation attemps, a subsequent retry may
successfully charge memcg->memsw but fail on the memcg->memory charge.
In this case, swapping should be permitted, but the carried-over state
prevents it.

This issue was identified during code reading of try_charge_memcg()
while analyzing memsw limit behavior in tiered-memory systems;
no production failures have been reported yet.

Fix by moving the initialization of 'reclaim_options' inside the
retry loop, ensuring a clean state for every reclaim attempt.

Fixes: 6539cc053869 ("mm: memcontrol: fold mem_cgroup_do_charge()")
Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
v4:
- Clarify in the commit message that the issue was found via
  code reading (Michal).
- Add ACKs (Michal and Johannes).

 mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a47fb68dd65f..303ac622d22d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	struct page_counter *counter;
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool passed_oom = false;
-	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
+	unsigned int reclaim_options;
 	bool drained = false;
 	bool raised_max_event = false;
 	unsigned long pflags;
@@ -2572,6 +2572,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
 		batch = nr_pages;

+	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
 	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
 	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
 		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
--
2.53.0.959.g497ff81fa9-goog

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim

[Donet Tom]

Hi Bing

On 3/18/26 4:37 AM, Bing Jiao wrote:
> NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets in shrink_folio_list(), but
> it does not reduce the total memory usage of a memcg. In memcg direct
> reclaim paths (e.g., charge-triggered or manual limit writes), where
> demotion is allowed, this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim
> loop concludes it has satisfied the memory request without actually
> reducing the cgroup's charge.
>
> This could result in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all
> pages to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills when the
> cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion is still possible.
>
> Introduce the MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION flag to disable demotion in
> these memcg-specific reclaim paths. This ensures that reclaim
> progress is only counted when memory is actually freed or swapped out.

Thanks for the patch. With this change, are we completely disabling 
memory tiering in memcg?

>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/swap.h |  1 +
>   mm/memcontrol-v1.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>   mm/memcontrol.c      | 16 +++++++++++-----
>   mm/vmscan.c          |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 7a09df6977a5..e83897a6dc72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, int zone
>
>   #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
>   #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
> +#define MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION (1 << 3)
>   #define MIN_SWAPPINESS 0
>   #define MAX_SWAPPINESS 200
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> index 433bba9dfe71..3cb600e28e5b 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   	int ret;
>   	bool limits_invariant;
>   	struct page_counter *counter = memsw ? &memcg->memsw : &memcg->memory;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
> +
> +	if (!memsw)
> +		reclaim_options |= MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
>
>   	do {
>   		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> @@ -1500,7 +1504,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		}
>
>   		if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> -				memsw ? 0 : MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL)) {
> +						 reclaim_options, NULL)) {
>   			ret = -EBUSY;
>   			break;
>   		}
> @@ -1520,6 +1524,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_max(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   {
>   	int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>
>   	/* we call try-to-free pages for make this cgroup empty */
>   	lru_add_drain_all();
> @@ -1532,7 +1538,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>   			return -EINTR;
>
>   		if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL,
> -						  MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
> +						  reclaim_options, NULL))
>   			nr_retries--;
>   	}
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 303ac622d22d..fcf1cd0da643 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2287,6 +2287,8 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   				  gfp_t gfp_mask)
>   {
>   	unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>
>   	do {
>   		unsigned long pflags;
> @@ -2300,7 +2302,7 @@ static unsigned long reclaim_high(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
>   		nr_reclaimed += try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages,
>   							gfp_mask,
> -							MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP,
> +							reclaim_options,
>   							NULL);
>   		psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>   	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
> @@ -2572,7 +2574,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>   		/* Avoid the refill and flush of the older stock */
>   		batch = nr_pages;
>
> -	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP;
> +	reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP | MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>   	if (!do_memsw_account() ||
>   	    page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memsw, batch, &counter)) {
>   		if (page_counter_try_charge(&memcg->memory, batch, &counter))
> @@ -2610,7 +2612,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
>
>   	psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
>   	nr_reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(mem_over_limit, nr_pages,
> -						    gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
> +					gfp_mask, reclaim_options, NULL);
>   	psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>
>   	if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> @@ -4638,6 +4640,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>   {
>   	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>   	unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>   	bool drained = false;
>   	unsigned long high;
>   	int err;
> @@ -4669,7 +4673,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_high_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>   		}
>
>   		reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - high,
> -					GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL);
> +					GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL);
>
>   		if (!reclaimed && !nr_retries--)
>   			break;
> @@ -4690,6 +4694,8 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>   {
>   	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(of_css(of));
>   	unsigned int nr_reclaims = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
> +	unsigned int reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
> +				       MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
>   	bool drained = false;
>   	unsigned long max;
>   	int err;
> @@ -4721,7 +4727,7 @@ static ssize_t memory_max_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>
>   		if (nr_reclaims) {
>   			if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, nr_pages - max,
> -					GFP_KERNEL, MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP, NULL))
> +					GFP_KERNEL, reclaim_options, NULL))
>   				nr_reclaims--;
>   			continue;
>   		}
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 33287ba4a500..7a8617ba1748 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -6809,6 +6809,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		.may_unmap = 1,
>   		.may_swap = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP),
>   		.proactive = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE),
> +		.no_demotion = !!(reclaim_options & MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION),
>   	};
>   	/*
>   	 * Traverse the ZONELIST_FALLBACK zonelist of the current node to put


Did you run any performance benchmarks with this patch?


This patch looks good to me. Feel free to add

Reviewed by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>


> --
> 2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog
>
>

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcontrol: disable demotion in memcg direct reclaim

[Bing Jiao]

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 06:47:14PM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
> Hi Bing
>
> On 3/18/26 4:37 AM, Bing Jiao wrote:
> > NUMA demotion counts towards reclaim targets in shrink_folio_list(), but
> > it does not reduce the total memory usage of a memcg. In memcg direct
> > reclaim paths (e.g., charge-triggered or manual limit writes), where
> > demotion is allowed, this leads to "fake progress" where the reclaim
> > loop concludes it has satisfied the memory request without actually
> > reducing the cgroup's charge.
> >
> > This could result in inefficient reclaim loops, CPU waste, moving all
> > pages to far-tier nodes, and potentially premature OOM kills when the
> > cgroup is under memory pressure but demotion is still possible.
> >
> > Introduce the MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION flag to disable demotion in
> > these memcg-specific reclaim paths. This ensures that reclaim
> > progress is only counted when memory is actually freed or swapped out.

Hi, Donet,

Thank you for the feedback and reviewing the patch.

> Thanks for the patch. With this change, are we completely disabling memory
> tiering in memcg?

Yes, this change will completely disable demotion from memcg
directly reclaim, as demotion does not help to reduce memory usage.

>
> Did you run any performance benchmarks with this patch?
>
>
> This patch looks good to me. Feel free to add
>
> Reviewed by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks again for the review!

Following a discussion with Yosry regarding demotion as an aging process,
I have decided to drop patches 2 and 3 from this series for now.

Additionally, Joshua Hahn's RFC ('Make memcg limits tier-aware') [1]
introduces a mechanism to scale memcg limits based on the ratio of
top-tier to total memory. This approach or similar approaches might
provide a more comprehensive way to resolve 'fake progress' in memcg
direct reclaim or establish a better framework for addressing such
issues in the future.

Hope you have great weekend!

Best regards,
Bing

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260223223830.586018-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com/

[PATCH 3/3] mm/vmscan: add demote= option to proactive reclaim

[Bing Jiao]

In tiered-memory systems, proactive memory reclaim (via the cgroup
memory.reclaim interface) can demote pages to a lower memory tier
before eventually reclaiming them to swap.

Add a 'demote=%u' option to memory.reclaim to allow users to control
this behavior. Setting 'demote=1' enables demotion, while 'demote=0'
disables it. By default, demote is disabled (0).

This change ensures that proactive reclaim behaves consistently with
cgroup limit-based reclaim (e.g., memory.high), where the goal is
typically to reduce the overall memory footprint rather than migrating
it to slower tiers.

Signed-off-by: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7a8617ba1748..80194270fa2e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7878,11 +7878,13 @@ static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 enum {
 	MEMORY_RECLAIM_SWAPPINESS = 0,
 	MEMORY_RECLAIM_SWAPPINESS_MAX,
+	MEMORY_RECLAIM_ALLOW_DEMOTION,
 	MEMORY_RECLAIM_NULL,
 };
 static const match_table_t tokens = {
 	{ MEMORY_RECLAIM_SWAPPINESS, "swappiness=%d"},
 	{ MEMORY_RECLAIM_SWAPPINESS_MAX, "swappiness=max"},
+	{ MEMORY_RECLAIM_ALLOW_DEMOTION, "demote=%u"},
 	{ MEMORY_RECLAIM_NULL, NULL },
 };

@@ -7890,6 +7892,7 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,
 			   struct mem_cgroup *memcg, pg_data_t *pgdat)
 {
 	unsigned int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
+	unsigned int allow_demotion = 0;
 	unsigned long nr_to_reclaim, nr_reclaimed = 0;
 	int swappiness = -1;
 	char *old_buf, *start;
@@ -7922,6 +7925,10 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,
 		case MEMORY_RECLAIM_SWAPPINESS_MAX:
 			swappiness = SWAPPINESS_ANON_ONLY;
 			break;
+		case MEMORY_RECLAIM_ALLOW_DEMOTION:
+			if (match_uint(&args[0], &allow_demotion))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			break;
 		default:
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -7947,6 +7954,8 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,

 			reclaim_options = MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP |
 					  MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE;
+			if (!allow_demotion)
+				reclaim_options |= MEMCG_RECLAIM_NO_DEMOTION;
 			reclaimed = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg,
 						 batch_size, gfp_mask,
 						 reclaim_options,
@@ -7962,6 +7971,7 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,
 				.may_unmap = 1,
 				.may_swap = 1,
 				.proactive = 1,
+				.no_demotion = !(allow_demotion),
 			};

 			if (test_and_set_bit_lock(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED,
--
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog