From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: sink mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios() into free_unref_folios()
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:07:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac0d1ef0-1cbd-40d1-9f0f-c12d890be3ec@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827145209.GA3004@cmpxchg.org>
On 8/27/2026 10:52 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 11:05:16AM +0800, Ridong Chen wrote:
>> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
>>
>> Every caller of free_unref_folios() invokes mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios()
>> on the same batch immediately beforehand. This pattern is duplicated
>> across shrink_folio_list(), move_folios_to_lru(), folio_batch_move_lru()
>> and folios_put_refs().
>>
>> Move the uncharge into free_unref_folios() itself so the batch is
>> uncharged in one place before the folios are freed. This removes the
>> repeated boilerplate at every call site and makes it impossible to free
>> a batch without uncharging it first. No functional change intended.
>
> Hm, IMO this is confusing. You're making uncharging an included
> service in a subset of the page allocator freeing API. Batch freeing
> uncharges, but single page freeing does not.
>
> I don't think saving 7 lines is worth that API caveat.
Thanks Johannes.
I thought this could improve cohesion, since we have to uncharge the batch when
freeing unreferenced folios. However, I didn't consider the symmetry with single
folio freeing.
I'll just drop the patch if it's causing confusion.
--
Best regards
Ridong
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 3:05 [PATCH] memcg: sink mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios() into free_unref_folios() Ridong Chen
2026-08-27 14:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-08-28 2:07 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac0d1ef0-1cbd-40d1-9f0f-c12d890be3ec@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox