* [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/vmalloc: extract vm_area_free_pages() helper from vfree()
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/vmalloc: fix vrealloc() grow-in-place check Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
Extract the page-freeing loop and NR_VMALLOC stat accounting from
vfree() into a reusable vm_area_free_pages() helper. The helper operates
on a range [start_idx, end_idx) of pages from a vm_struct, making it
suitable for both full free (vfree) and partial free (upcoming vrealloc
shrink).
Freed page pointers in vm->pages[] are set to NULL to prevent stale
references when the vm_struct outlives the free (as in vrealloc shrink).
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index c607307c657a..3977398e56e4 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3416,6 +3416,38 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
schedule_work(&p->wq);
}
+/*
+ * vm_area_free_pages - free a range of pages from a vmalloc allocation
+ * @vm: the vm_struct containing the pages
+ * @start_idx: first page index to free (inclusive)
+ * @end_idx: last page index to free (exclusive)
+ *
+ * Free pages [start_idx, end_idx) updating NR_VMALLOC stat accounting.
+ * Freed vm->pages[] entries are set to NULL.
+ * Caller is responsible for unmapping (vunmap_range) and KASAN
+ * poisoning before calling this.
+ */
+static void vm_area_free_pages(struct vm_struct *vm, unsigned int start_idx,
+ unsigned int end_idx)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = start_idx; i < end_idx; i++) {
+ struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
+
+ BUG_ON(!page);
+ /*
+ * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
+ * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
+ */
+ if (!(vm->flags & VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES))
+ mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_VMALLOC, -1);
+ __free_page(page);
+ vm->pages[i] = NULL;
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+}
+
/**
* vfree - Release memory allocated by vmalloc()
* @addr: Memory base address
@@ -3436,7 +3468,6 @@ void vfree_atomic(const void *addr)
void vfree(const void *addr)
{
struct vm_struct *vm;
- int i;
if (unlikely(in_interrupt())) {
vfree_atomic(addr);
@@ -3459,19 +3490,7 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
if (unlikely(vm->flags & VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS))
vm_reset_perms(vm);
- for (i = 0; i < vm->nr_pages; i++) {
- struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
-
- BUG_ON(!page);
- /*
- * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
- * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
- */
- if (!(vm->flags & VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES))
- mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_VMALLOC, -1);
- __free_page(page);
- cond_resched();
- }
+ vm_area_free_pages(vm, 0, vm->nr_pages);
kvfree(vm->pages);
kfree(vm);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/vmalloc: fix vrealloc() grow-in-place check
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/vmalloc: extract vm_area_free_pages() helper from vfree() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mm/vmalloc: zero newly exposed memory on vrealloc() grow Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
Fix the grow-in-place check in vrealloc() to compare the requested size
against the actual physical page count (vm->nr_pages) rather than the
virtual area size (alloced_size, derived from get_vm_area_size()).
The virtual reservation size (get_vm_area_size()) does not decrease when
pages are freed during a shrink operation. Consequently, without this fix,
a subsequent grow-in-place operation after a shrink would incorrectly
succeed and attempt to access freed pages. Correcting this check is a
prerequisite for the upcoming vrealloc() shrink functionality.
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 3977398e56e4..7bc7a6892c1a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4361,7 +4361,7 @@ void *vrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align
/*
* We already have the bytes available in the allocation; use them.
*/
- if (size <= alloced_size) {
+ if (size <= (size_t)vm->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) {
/*
* No need to zero memory here, as unused memory will have
* already been zeroed at initial allocation time or during
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 3/6] mm/vmalloc: zero newly exposed memory on vrealloc() grow
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/vmalloc: extract vm_area_free_pages() helper from vfree() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/vmalloc: fix vrealloc() grow-in-place check Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/vmalloc: protect /proc/vmallocinfo readers with READ_ONCE() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
When growing an existing vmalloc allocation in-place, zero the newly
exposed memory region [old_size, size) if the caller requested it via
__GFP_ZERO (checked via want_init_on_alloc(flags)).
Previously, the code assumed that the unused capacity in the vm_struct
was already zeroed either at initial allocation time or during a prior
shrink. However, if an intermediate shrink operation occurred without
__GFP_ZERO and without init_on_free enabled, the "freed" portion of the
allocation would retain its old data.
If a subsequent grow-in-place operation then explicitly requests
__GFP_ZERO, failing to zero the memory here would violate the allocation
flags and leak the previously discarded, potentially sensitive data.
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 7bc7a6892c1a..64f5d1088281 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4362,13 +4362,16 @@ void *vrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align
* We already have the bytes available in the allocation; use them.
*/
if (size <= (size_t)vm->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) {
- /*
- * No need to zero memory here, as unused memory will have
- * already been zeroed at initial allocation time or during
- * realloc shrink time.
- */
vm->requested_size = size;
kasan_vrealloc(p, old_size, size);
+
+ /*
+ * Zero the newly exposed bytes if requested.
+ * The region [old_size, size) may contain stale data from
+ * a previous shrink that did not use __GFP_ZERO.
+ */
+ if (want_init_on_alloc(flags))
+ memset((void *)p + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
return (void *)p;
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/vmalloc: protect /proc/vmallocinfo readers with READ_ONCE()
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mm/vmalloc: zero newly exposed memory on vrealloc() grow Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-22 14:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
The /proc/vmallocinfo readers, specifically show_numa_info() and
vmalloc_info_show(), currently read v->nr_pages and the v->pages
array without any concurrent protection.
In preparation for vrealloc() shrink support, where v->nr_pages can
be decreased and entries in the v->pages array can be nulled out
concurrently, these readers must be protected to prevent use-after-free
or NULL pointer dereferences.
Update show_numa_info() to use READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages) and
READ_ONCE(v->pages[nr]), explicitly checking for NULL before
dereferencing the page. Similarly, update vmalloc_info_show() to
read nr_pages safely to avoid parsing a torn or inconsistent value.
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 64f5d1088281..7658fdc087d2 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -5204,7 +5204,7 @@ bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object)
static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v,
unsigned int *counters)
{
- unsigned int nr;
+ unsigned int nr, nr_pages;
unsigned int step = 1U << vm_area_page_order(v);
if (!counters)
@@ -5212,8 +5212,13 @@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v,
memset(counters, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
- for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr += step)
- counters[page_to_nid(v->pages[nr])] += step;
+ nr_pages = READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages);
+ for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr += step) {
+ struct page *page = READ_ONCE(v->pages[nr]);
+
+ if (page)
+ counters[page_to_nid(page)] += step;
+ }
for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
if (counters[nr])
seq_printf(m, " N%u=%u", nr, counters[nr]);
@@ -5241,6 +5246,7 @@ static int vmalloc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
struct vmap_area *va;
struct vm_struct *v;
unsigned int *counters;
+ unsigned int nr_pages;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
counters = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -5270,8 +5276,9 @@ static int vmalloc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
if (v->caller)
seq_printf(m, " %pS", v->caller);
- if (v->nr_pages)
- seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", v->nr_pages);
+ nr_pages = READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages);
+ if (nr_pages)
+ seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", nr_pages);
if (v->phys_addr)
seq_printf(m, " phys=%pa", &v->phys_addr);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/vmalloc: protect /proc/vmallocinfo readers with READ_ONCE()
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/vmalloc: protect /proc/vmallocinfo readers with READ_ONCE() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-22 14:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Uladzislau Rezki @ 2026-03-22 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shivamkalra98
Cc: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich
On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 11:35:49PM +0530, Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
>
> The /proc/vmallocinfo readers, specifically show_numa_info() and
> vmalloc_info_show(), currently read v->nr_pages and the v->pages
> array without any concurrent protection.
>
> In preparation for vrealloc() shrink support, where v->nr_pages can
> be decreased and entries in the v->pages array can be nulled out
> concurrently, these readers must be protected to prevent use-after-free
> or NULL pointer dereferences.
>
> Update show_numa_info() to use READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages) and
> READ_ONCE(v->pages[nr]), explicitly checking for NULL before
> dereferencing the page. Similarly, update vmalloc_info_show() to
> read nr_pages safely to avoid parsing a torn or inconsistent value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 64f5d1088281..7658fdc087d2 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -5204,7 +5204,7 @@ bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object)
> static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v,
> unsigned int *counters)
> {
> - unsigned int nr;
> + unsigned int nr, nr_pages;
> unsigned int step = 1U << vm_area_page_order(v);
>
> if (!counters)
> @@ -5212,8 +5212,13 @@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v,
>
> memset(counters, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
>
> - for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr += step)
> - counters[page_to_nid(v->pages[nr])] += step;
> + nr_pages = READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages);
> + for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr += step) {
> + struct page *page = READ_ONCE(v->pages[nr]);
> +
> + if (page)
> + counters[page_to_nid(page)] += step;
> + }
> for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
> if (counters[nr])
> seq_printf(m, " N%u=%u", nr, counters[nr]);
> @@ -5241,6 +5246,7 @@ static int vmalloc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> struct vmap_area *va;
> struct vm_struct *v;
> unsigned int *counters;
> + unsigned int nr_pages;
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
> counters = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -5270,8 +5276,9 @@ static int vmalloc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> if (v->caller)
> seq_printf(m, " %pS", v->caller);
>
> - if (v->nr_pages)
> - seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", v->nr_pages);
> + nr_pages = READ_ONCE(v->nr_pages);
> + if (nr_pages)
> + seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", nr_pages);
>
> if (v->phys_addr)
> seq_printf(m, " phys=%pa", &v->phys_addr);
>
It is protected by the vn->busy.lock. When you update the page counter
in the vrealloc, we should do it under the lock if i do not miss anything.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 5/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/vmalloc: protect /proc/vmallocinfo readers with READ_ONCE() Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] lib/test_vmalloc: add vrealloc test case Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 23:52 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Andrew Morton
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
When vrealloc() shrinks an allocation and the new size crosses a page
boundary, unmap and free the tail pages that are no longer needed. This
reclaims physical memory that was previously wasted for the lifetime
of the allocation.
The heuristic is simple: always free when at least one full page becomes
unused. Huge page allocations (page_order > 0) are skipped, as partial
freeing would require splitting. Allocations with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
are also skipped, as their direct-map permissions must be reset before
pages are returned to the page allocator, which is handled by
vm_reset_perms() during vfree().
Additionally, allocations with VM_USERMAP are skipped because
remap_vmalloc_range_partial() validates mapping requests against the
unchanged vm->size; freeing tail pages would cause vmalloc_to_page()
to return NULL for the unmapped range.
To protect concurrent /proc/vmallocinfo readers, the shrink path
updates vm->nr_pages with WRITE_ONCE() before freeing the pages.
Finally, we notify kmemleak of the reduced allocation size using
kmemleak_free_part() to prevent the kmemleak scanner from faulting on
the newly unmapped virtual addresses.
The virtual address reservation (vm->size / vmap_area) is intentionally
kept unchanged, preserving the address for potential future grow-in-place
support.
Suggested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 7658fdc087d2..8b8752fc10e9 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4345,14 +4345,48 @@ void *vrealloc_node_align_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, unsigned long align
goto need_realloc;
}
- /*
- * TODO: Shrink the vm_area, i.e. unmap and free unused pages. What
- * would be a good heuristic for when to shrink the vm_area?
- */
if (size <= old_size) {
+ unsigned int new_nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
/* Zero out "freed" memory, potentially for future realloc. */
if (want_init_on_free() || want_init_on_alloc(flags))
memset((void *)p + size, 0, old_size - size);
+
+ /*
+ * Free tail pages when shrink crosses a page boundary.
+ *
+ * Skip huge page allocations (page_order > 0) as partial
+ * freeing would require splitting.
+ *
+ * Skip VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, as direct-map permissions must
+ * be reset before pages are returned to the allocator.
+ *
+ * Skip VM_USERMAP, as remap_vmalloc_range_partial() validates
+ * mapping requests against the unchanged vm->size; freeing
+ * tail pages would cause vmalloc_to_page() to return NULL for
+ * the unmapped range.
+ */
+ if (new_nr_pages < vm->nr_pages && !vm_area_page_order(vm) &&
+ !(vm->flags & (VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS | VM_USERMAP))) {
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p;
+ unsigned int old_nr_pages = vm->nr_pages;
+
+ /* Notify kmemleak of the reduced allocation size before unmapping. */
+ kmemleak_free_part(
+ (void *)addr + (new_nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT),
+ (old_nr_pages - new_nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ vunmap_range(addr + (new_nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT),
+ addr + (old_nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
+
+ /*
+ * Update nr_pages before freeing pages to prevent
+ * a concurrent reader (e.g. show_numa_info via
+ * /proc/vmallocinfo) from accessing NULL entries.
+ */
+ WRITE_ONCE(vm->nr_pages, new_nr_pages);
+ vm_area_free_pages(vm, new_nr_pages, old_nr_pages);
+ }
vm->requested_size = size;
kasan_vrealloc(p, old_size, size);
return (void *)p;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 6/6] lib/test_vmalloc: add vrealloc test case
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 18:05 ` Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
2026-03-21 23:52 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Andrew Morton
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay @ 2026-03-21 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich,
Shivam Kalra
From: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
Introduce a new test case "vrealloc_test" that exercises the vrealloc()
shrink and in-place grow paths:
- Grow beyond allocated pages (triggers full reallocation).
- Shrink crossing a page boundary (frees tail pages).
- Shrink within the same page (no page freeing).
- Grow within the already allocated page count (in-place).
Data integrity is validated after each realloc step by checking that
the first byte of the original allocation is preserved.
The test is gated behind run_test_mask bit 12 (id 4096).
Signed-off-by: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
---
lib/test_vmalloc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
index 876c72c18a0c..e822830f0887 100644
--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ __param(int, run_test_mask, 7,
"\t\tid: 512, name: kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test\n"
"\t\tid: 1024, name: vm_map_ram_test\n"
"\t\tid: 2048, name: no_block_alloc_test\n"
+ "\t\tid: 4096, name: vrealloc_test\n"
/* Add a new test case description here. */
);
@@ -421,6 +422,66 @@ vm_map_ram_test(void)
return nr_allocated != map_nr_pages;
}
+static int vrealloc_test(void)
+{
+ void *ptr, *tmp;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < test_loop_count; i++) {
+ int err = -1;
+
+ ptr = vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!ptr)
+ return -1;
+
+ *((__u8 *)ptr) = 'a';
+
+ /* Grow: beyond allocated pages, triggers full realloc. */
+ tmp = vrealloc(ptr, 4 * PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ goto error;
+ ptr = tmp;
+
+ if (*((__u8 *)ptr) != 'a')
+ goto error;
+
+ /* Shrink: crosses page boundary, frees tail pages. */
+ tmp = vrealloc(ptr, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ goto error;
+ ptr = tmp;
+
+ if (*((__u8 *)ptr) != 'a')
+ goto error;
+
+ /* Shrink: within same page, no page freeing. */
+ tmp = vrealloc(ptr, PAGE_SIZE / 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ goto error;
+ ptr = tmp;
+
+ if (*((__u8 *)ptr) != 'a')
+ goto error;
+
+ /* Grow: within allocated page, in-place, no realloc. */
+ tmp = vrealloc(ptr, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ goto error;
+ ptr = tmp;
+
+ if (*((__u8 *)ptr) != 'a')
+ goto error;
+
+ err = 0;
+error:
+ vfree(ptr);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
struct test_case_desc {
const char *test_name;
int (*test_func)(void);
@@ -440,6 +501,7 @@ static struct test_case_desc test_case_array[] = {
{ "kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test", kvfree_rcu_2_arg_vmalloc_test, },
{ "vm_map_ram_test", vm_map_ram_test, },
{ "no_block_alloc_test", no_block_alloc_test, true },
+ { "vrealloc_test", vrealloc_test, },
/* Add a new test case here. */
};
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink
2026-03-21 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/6] mm/vmalloc: free unused pages on vrealloc() shrink Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-21 18:05 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] lib/test_vmalloc: add vrealloc test case Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay
@ 2026-03-21 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-03-21 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shivamkalra98
Cc: Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay, Uladzislau Rezki, linux-mm,
linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl, Danilo Krummrich
On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 23:35:45 +0530 Shivam Kalra via B4 Relay <devnull+shivamkalra98.zohomail.in@kernel.org> wrote:
> This series implements the TODO in vrealloc() to unmap and free unused
> pages when shrinking across a page boundary.
AI review claims to have found several issues:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260321-vmalloc-shrink-v6-0-062ca7b7ceb2@zohomail.in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread