public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 2/3] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 07:34:45 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acRG5f9QjdEKg2JB@dread> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325-blk-dontcache-v4-2-c4b56db43f64@columbia.edu>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 02:43:01PM -0400, Tal Zussman wrote:
> Set BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK on iomap writeback bios when
> IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE is set. This ensures that bi_end_io runs in task
> context, where folio_end_dropbehind() can safely invalidate folios.
> 
> With the bio layer now handling task-context deferral generically, XFS
> no longer needs to route DONTCACHE ioends through its completion
> workqueue for page cache invalidation. Remove the DONTCACHE check from
> xfs_ioend_needs_wq_completion().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/ioend.c  | 2 ++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/ioend.c b/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> index e4d57cb969f1..6b8375d11cc0 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/ioend.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static struct iomap_ioend *iomap_alloc_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  			       GFP_NOFS, &iomap_ioend_bioset);
>  	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = iomap_sector(&wpc->iomap, pos);
>  	bio->bi_write_hint = wpc->inode->i_write_hint;
> +	if (ioend_flags & IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE)
> +		bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK);
>  	wbc_init_bio(wpc->wbc, bio);
>  	wpc->nr_folios = 0;
>  	return iomap_init_ioend(wpc->inode, bio, pos, ioend_flags);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 76678814f46f..0d469b91377d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -510,10 +510,6 @@ xfs_ioend_needs_wq_completion(
>  	if (ioend->io_flags & (IOMAP_IOEND_UNWRITTEN | IOMAP_IOEND_SHARED))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	/* Page cache invalidation cannot be done in irq context. */
> -	if (ioend->io_flags & IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE)
> -		return true;
> -
>  	return false;
>  }

Ok, so higher layers can set it.

At this point, I'd suggest that we should not be making random
one-off changes to the iomap and filesystem layers like this just
for one operation that needs deferred IO completion work. This needs
to considered from the overall perspective of how we defer
completion work -  there are lots of different paths through
filesystems and/or iomap that require/use task deferal for IO
completion. We want them all to use the same mechanism - splitting
deferal between multiple layers depending on IO type is not a
particularly nice thing to be doing...

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
dgc@kernel.org


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-25 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 18:42 [PATCH RFC v4 0/3] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-03-25 18:43 ` [PATCH RFC v4 1/3] block: add BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for task-context completion Tal Zussman
2026-03-25 19:54   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-25 20:14   ` Jens Axboe
2026-03-25 20:26   ` Dave Chinner
2026-03-25 20:39     ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-26  2:44       ` Dave Chinner
2026-03-25 21:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2026-03-26  3:18     ` Dave Chinner
2026-03-25 18:43 ` [PATCH RFC v4 2/3] iomap: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for dropbehind writeback Tal Zussman
2026-03-25 20:21   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-25 20:34   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2026-03-25 18:43 ` [PATCH RFC v4 3/3] block: enable RWF_DONTCACHE for block devices Tal Zussman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acRG5f9QjdEKg2JB@dread \
    --to=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox