Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] selftests/cgroup: improve zswap tests robustness and support large page sizes

[Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 4:06 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:29:20 +0800 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Test all passed on:
> > > >   x86_64(4k), aarch64(4K, 64K), ppc64le(64K).
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew, All,
> > >
> > > I see that Sashiko still points out minor issues in this patchset,
> > > That seems very tiny in selftest programming.
> > >
> > > I can correct all that in a new version if you'd like a perfect patchset.
> > >
> > > Sashiko comments:
> > >   https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260326032658.96819-1-liwang%40redhat.com
> >
> > Ah, OK, you already looked.
> >
> > If you say they're too minor then I'm OK with that.  If there are any
> > you feel you'd like to address then go for it.  That's my opinion,
> > others might differ!
> >
> > I suggest you leave things as-is for a while (a week?), give the memcg
> > maintainers time to take a look (please).

Sounds reasonable!

> I think some of the comments are worth addressing, especially:

+1

> Patch 4:
> Using BUF_SIZE in the allocation helpers is wrong, we should use the
> actual page size.
> 
> Patch 6:
> Zero initialization of zw_allocation.

Thanks, and plus:

 Patch 7:
   Adjust the code comments.

 Patch 8:
   Declear long type for elapsed and count variables

> But yeah as Andrew said, it may be worth waiting for memcg maintainers
> to take a look before sending a new version.

Sure, I will allow a week for others to review it.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang