From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: reinstate unconditional writeback start in balance_dirty_pages()
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:24:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acavP-qpB0c1nNO7@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326215127.3857682-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 02:51:27PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> Commit 64dd89ae01f2 ("mm/block/fs: remove laptop_mode") removed this
> unconditional writeback start from balance_dirty_pages():
>
> if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(wb)))
> wb_start_background_writeback(wb);
>
> This logic needs to be reinstated to prevent performance regressions for
> strictlimited BDIs and memcg setups. The problem occurs because:
>
> a) For strictlimited BDIs, throttling is calculated using per-wb
> thresholds. The per-wb threshold can be exceeded even when the global
> dirty threshold was not exceeded (nr_dirty < gdtc->bg_thresh)
>
> b) For memcg-based throttling, memcg uses its own dirty count /
> thresholds and can trigger throttling even when the global threshold
> isn't exceeded
>
> Without the unconditional writeback start, IO is throttled as it waits
> for dirty pages to be written back but there is no writeback running.
> This leads to severe stalls. On fuse, buffered write performance
> dropped from 1400 MiB/s to 2000 KiB/s.
>
> Reinstate the unconditional writeback start so that writeback is
> guaranteed to be running whenever IO needs to be throttled.
>
> Fixes: 64dd89ae01f2 ("mm/block/fs: remove laptop_mode")
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Thanks for the fix. This was a combination of the old comment and my
overly hasty read of the existing dirty > bg_thresh &&
!writeback_in_progress() block. The patch looks good to me.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 21:51 [PATCH v2 0/1] mm: reinstate unconditional writeback start in balance_dirty_pages() Joanne Koong
2026-03-26 21:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Joanne Koong
2026-03-27 0:54 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-27 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-27 16:04 ` Jan Kara
2026-03-27 16:24 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acavP-qpB0c1nNO7@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox