Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: avoid weird message in hugetlb_init

[Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2107 bytes --]


On 4/13/20 2:33 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 4/10/20 8:47 AM, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On platforms that support multiple huge page sizes when 'hugepagesz' is not
>> specified before 'hugepages=', hugepages are not allocated. (For example
>> if we are requesting 1GB hugepages)
> Hi Nitesh,
>
> This should only be an issue with gigantic huge pages.  This is because
> hugepages=X not following a hugepagesz=Y specifies the number of huge pages
> of default size to allocate.  It does not currently work for gigantic pages.

I see, since we changed the default hugepages to gigantic pages and we missed
'hugepagesz=' no page were allocated of any type.

> In the other thread, I provided this explanation as to why:
> It comes about because we do not definitively set the default huge page size
> until after command line processing (in hugetlb_init).  And, we must
> preallocate gigantic huge pages during command line processing because that
> is when the bootmem allocater is available.
>
> I will be looking into modifying this behavior to allocate the pages as
> expected, even for gigantic pages.

Nice, looking forward to it.

>
>> In terms of reporting meminfo and /sys/kernel/../nr_hugepages reports the
>> expected results but if we use sysctl vm.nr_hugepages then it reports a non-zero
>> value as it reads the max_huge_pages from the default hstate instead of
>> nr_huge_pages.
>> AFAIK nr_huge_pages is the one that indicates the number of huge pages that are
>> successfully allocated.
>>
>> Does vm.nr_hugepages is expected to report the maximum number of hugepages? If
>> so, will it not make sense to rename the procname?
>>
>> However, if we expect nr_hugepages to report the number of successfully
>> allocated hugepages then we should use nr_huge_pages in
>> hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common().
> This looks like a bug.  Neither sysctl or the /proc file should be reporting
> a non-zero value if huge pages do not exist.

Yeap, as I mentioned it reports max_huge_pages instead of the nr_huge_pages.

-- 
Thanks
Nitesh


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]