From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: multi objcg charge support
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag9hFJv_LOJh7IVE@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b09f618-3b84-4163-84f9-f3adc0f1cc97@kernel.org>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 10:43:11AM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/26 10:05 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 06:35:30PM +0900, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > > > @@ -3350,19 +3405,45 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> > > > goto out;
> > > > }
> > > > - stock_nr_bytes = stock->nr_bytes;
> > > > - if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
> > > > - drain_obj_stock(stock);
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < NR_OBJ_STOCK; ++i) {
> > > > + struct obj_cgroup *cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached[i]);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!cached) {
> > > > + if (empty_slot == -1)
> > > > + empty_slot = i;
> > > > + continue;
> > > > + }
> > > > + if (cached == objcg) {
> > > > + slot = i;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (slot == -1) {
> > > > + slot = empty_slot;
> > > > + if (slot == -1) {
> > > > + slot = get_random_u32_below(NR_OBJ_STOCK);
> > >
> > > It would break kmalloc_nolock() because _get_random_bytes() uses a spinlock.
> > > perhaps prandom_u32_state() should be sufficient in this case.
>
> s/spinlock/local_lock/
I do see spinlock in crng_make_state() for some code paths.
>
> > > Is there a reason why it uses random eviction, unlike multi-memcg percpu
> > > charge cache?
> >
> > Oh I didn't know and actually we are already using get_random_u32_below() in
> > refill_stock(). So, it need fixing as well. That would be a separate patch.
>
> Ouch, I see.
> > I will explore prandom_u32_state().
>
> Thanks!
>
> FYI, SLUB had a similar issue that was recently fixed:
> commit a1e244a9f1778 ("mm/slab: use prandom if !allow_spin").
>
> It uses prandom if spinning is not allowed when shuffling slab freelist.
The drain does not really need a random number. Fixing an index like 0 makes it
much simpler but it might expose some corner cases. Round robin might be enough
for this though. I will see what would be the easiest way forward.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 5:31 [PATCH 0/4] memcg: shrink obj_stock_pcp and cache multiple objcgs Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: store node_id instead of pglist_data pointer Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 6:01 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-20 6:13 ` Muchun Song
2026-05-20 5:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: uint16_t for nr_bytes in obj_stock_pcp Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 6:41 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-20 7:01 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-21 1:01 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 13:20 ` David Laight
2026-05-21 1:03 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 5:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: int16_t for cached slab stats Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 7:25 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-20 5:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: multi objcg charge support Shakeel Butt
2026-05-20 9:35 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-21 1:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-21 1:43 ` Harry Yoo
2026-05-21 20:19 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-05-21 3:22 ` Joshua Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag9hFJv_LOJh7IVE@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox