Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: "kernel test robot" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Carlier" <devnexen@gmail.com>,
	"Allen Pais" <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Axel Rasmussen" <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"Chengming Zhou" <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huawei.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Hamza Mahfooz" <hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Harry Yoo" <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
	"Imran Khan" <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Kamalesh Babulal" <kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com>,
	"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	"Liam Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Muchun Song" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	"Nhat Pham" <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Usama Arif" <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Wei Xu" <weixugc@google.com>, "Yosry Ahmed" <yosry@kernel.org>,
	"Yuanchu Xie" <yuanchu@google.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 07:27:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agSJ4ulNDZ17ah8H@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agSAT4ldp3dzKWPl@linux.dev>

On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 06:49:45AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:10:34AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/13/26 12:03 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:56:52PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > kernel test robot noticed a 67.7% regression of stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec on:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > commit: 01b9da291c4969354807b52956f4aae1f41b4924 ("mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg per-node type")
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > 
> > > This is most probably due to shuffling of struct mem_cgroup and struct
> > > mem_cgroup_per_node members.
> > 
> > Another possibility is that after objcg was split into per-node, the
> > slab accounting fast path is still designed assuming only one current
> > objcg per CPU:
> > 
> > struct obj_stock_pcp {
> >     struct obj_cgroup *cached_objcg;
> > };
> > 
> > So it's may cause the following thrashing:
> > 
> >  CPU stock cached = memcg/node0 objcg
> >  free object tagged = memcg/node1 objcg
> >  => __refill_obj_stock --> objcg mismatch
> >      => drain_obj_stock()
> >      => cache switches to node1 objcg
> > 
> >  next local allocation tagged = node0 objcg
> >  => mismatch again
> >      => drain_obj_stock()
> 
> Actually I think this is the issue, we have ping pong threads running on
> different nodes where though theu are in same cgroup but their current->obcg is
> for local node and thus this ping pong is thrashing the per-cpu objcg stock.
> 
> The easier fix would be to compare objcg->memcg instead of just objcg during
> draining and caching. In addition we can add support for multiple objcg per-cpu
> stock caching.

Something like the following:

From d756abe831a905d6fe32bad9a984fc619dafb7e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 07:24:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: skip obj_stock drain when refilled objcg
 shares memcg

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d978e18b9b2d..01ed7a8e18ac 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3318,6 +3318,7 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
 			       unsigned int nr_bytes,
 			       bool allow_uncharge)
 {
+	struct obj_cgroup *cached;
 	unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
 
 	if (!stock) {
@@ -3327,7 +3328,18 @@ static void __refill_obj_stock(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg) != objcg) { /* reset if necessary */
+	cached = READ_ONCE(stock->cached_objcg);
+	if (cached != objcg &&
+	    (!cached || obj_cgroup_memcg(cached) != obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg))) {
 		drain_obj_stock(stock);
 		obj_cgroup_get(objcg);
 		stock->nr_bytes = atomic_read(&objcg->nr_charged_bytes)
-- 
2.53.0-Meta



      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 12:56 [linus:master] [mm] 01b9da291c: stress-ng.switch.ops_per_sec 67.7% regression kernel test robot
2026-05-12 16:03 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13  2:10   ` Qi Zheng
2026-05-13 13:49     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-05-13 14:27       ` Shakeel Butt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agSJ4ulNDZ17ah8H@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox