From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] mm/slab: enable runtime sheaves tuning
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 13:52:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agr8Nzr8rnDBTuVX@pedro-suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516-sheaves-tuning-v1-0-221aa3e1d829@kernel.org>
On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 01:24:24AM +0900, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote:
> Background
> ==========
>
> Sheaves were introduced in v6.18, and starting from v7.0, they are
> enabled for all slab caches (except for kmem_cache{,_node}). In the
> pre-sheaves era, there was a cpu_partial parameter to tune the number
> of objects cached per CPU. However, sheaves don't have an equivalent
> and the sheaf capacity is determined in the kernel code.
What semantic do you need from this?
>
> The goal is to allow tuning sheaves at runtime by the next LTS.
>
> Overview
> ========
>
> This patchset does two main things:
>
> 1. Make the sheaf_capacity sysfs attribute writable so that the number
> of objects cached per CPU can be changed at runtime, and
>
> 2. Expose MAX_FULL_SHEAVES and MAX_EMPTY_SHEAVES as sysfs attributes
> rather than constants, so that users can tune them.
>
> Measuring the performance impact of these tunables is TBD.
>
> Roughly, the sequence to change sheaf_capacity is as follows:
>
> 1. Disable sheaves. Make all online CPUs replace their main sheaves
> with the bootstrap sheaf under local_lock and wait for completion.
This is extremely destabilizing performance-wise, were I to guess.
>
> 2. Wait for all in-flight RCU callbacks to be processed.
and this too.
>
> 3. Flush and free all existing sheaves.
>
> 4. Re-enable sheaves with a new capacity.
>
> Challenges
> ==========
>
> 1. Allocations and frees can happen concurrently at any point between
> these steps, and we cannot introduce heavyweight synchronization
> mechanisms on the fastpath.
>
> 2. Currently, cache_has_sheaves() checks whether a cache has sheaves.
> This works now because sheaves cannot be enabled or disabled once
> the cache is created.
>
> The question "Does this cache has sheaves?" should be split into
> "Does this cache support sheaves?" and "Does this CPU actually has
> sheaves enabled right now?".
>
> 3. Once the sheaf capacity update is complete, no sheaf with stale
> capacity must remain.
Why? I don't see a huge problem with having multiple sheaves with different
capacities, as long as you adequately, opportunistically kill the sheaves
if they don't have the desired size (say, once a sheaf is fully empty).
--
Pedro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 16:24 [PATCH RFC 0/8] mm/slab: enable runtime sheaves tuning Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] mm/slab: do not store cache pointer in struct slab_sheaf Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-19 4:08 ` Hao Li
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] mm/slab: change sheaf_capacity type to unsigned short Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] mm/slab: track capacity per sheaf Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] mm/slab: allow bootstrap_cache_sheaves() to fail Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] mm/slab: rework cache_has_sheaves() to check immutable properties only Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] mm/slab: allow changing sheaf_capacity at runtime Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-17 8:30 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-18 6:53 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] mm/slab: add pcs->lock lockdep assert when accessing the barn Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-15 16:24 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] mm/slab: allow changing max_{full,empty}_sheaves at runtime Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-05-18 11:52 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-05-20 4:35 ` [PATCH RFC 0/8] mm/slab: enable runtime sheaves tuning Harry Yoo
2026-06-09 12:52 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-09 13:54 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agr8Nzr8rnDBTuVX@pedro-suse \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox