From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74C12CD6E55 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C45AD6B03A3; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C1DC26B03A5; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:29:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B33DA6B03A6; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:29:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A117D6B03A3 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:29:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718581C1E28 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:29:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84831426204.03.F21603C Received: from out-182.mta1.migadu.com (out-182.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.182]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BF7C000B for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 13:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=m1Yh3jox; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of baoquan.he@linux.dev designates 95.215.58.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baoquan.he@linux.dev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1780320580; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=+R2lfmP9pQuhindin4fShCfv6Ae5W5y5CMwyefGW9qM=; b=51SpJgcF0Yx/rySJv7j+8b2qOwX+4gNnHqP7xoxWi3WDCddYDB5gmvP5koe44VTxLCgP4j m99VN3zxTtqP++12t46AV/AFnRhSda3UTudzxuoWHbLRNGYkmtc+ywIjJ5WaLjT/BNtqX0 aQ75E0SKDinRacFCovm/pP9GrmWYN6s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=m1Yh3jox; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of baoquan.he@linux.dev designates 95.215.58.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=baoquan.he@linux.dev; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1780320580; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=A93ZRA7/OS9mBjvKyH5NhceNf5edHdg9BS3AlxF9UsnLoBHrC9XucU+sCdxbtAOnlp8PR1 5ZLt+l2lWfAglKGe8BXf0lZwtAnsa73mycZi1pCwe7OEbuQx5CNJtZmOkMWGdRd1xT14m3 491Iatd9+e+jw4kGIcNedB7a+4C24NY= Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 21:29:30 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1780320578; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+R2lfmP9pQuhindin4fShCfv6Ae5W5y5CMwyefGW9qM=; b=m1Yh3joxqmiw1IAgN5b5XCYDJXluJDZqHpQameYZaGvpUex3E0DhnTy/xabw7QGBh9xAWn U1x5wTtQMBXTmQRkoE067IAoZ1XKBj5pKi0Z6b8l4XIowWr35cKQgFwBiaP6YzM2fedoXu emXekkZVGp4+0bH4ddUlwKmvkv2DQuU= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Baoquan He To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, chrisl@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev, kasong@tencent.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, youngjun.park@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: better block swap batching and a different take on swap_ops v2 Message-ID: References: <20260601113449.3464734-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260601113449.3464734-1-hch@lst.de> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Stat-Signature: ny5kgfa89wz3sj9hsq4gsje5r15e1bur X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B9BF7C000B X-HE-Tag: 1780320580-514195 X-HE-Meta: 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 RJS1UH3f 47QViug4Nk1qOW7InwADA9QzXt0LyDFJt0tsaVopI11cDDYEU0pC4kl2oAydINwsDrgT6jM11xymst+LHnwhw6lK0V/qNFC0gxSKe4f10LPX3b4fh3Gkp7F79mvp3IgxvUd8FibRvDIQglo+1POL5A7mDJycACkDVkY7Bz5FsAHzR5qgqdaQWFMwCY2sUGBPOlX5OP7M6GuitlrDTGO2Wd/QkvAAeebjOT/YPcqZeX7D6kQ5u+UnbL4vm1Z2EpwVAw+oWo92ssWASG67SwZjZxNuDfFchXj6yj0eTlrfmxBBfkAKuJXDjZqzGXTQZ0jyLDNgRt5yOa5wxZ4fd7/3bKTJ5f/aC1K6+yb6XhCM/TUowb4g= Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Christoph, On 06/01/26 at 01:34pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series makes use of the swap_iocb for block as well so that it > doesn't do inefficient single-bio I/O, and then rebases the swap_ops > from Baoquan on top of the now very different method structure. What tree is this series based on? I tried the latest mainline, linux-next main branch and Andrew's mm-unstable, all failed. And by the way, usually we add version number in each patch's subject as "[PATCH v2] xxx ". Thanks Baoquan