From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
david@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, r@hev.cc, jack@suse.cz,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au>,
apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, brauner@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, kees@kernel.org,
kevin.brodsky@arm.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, npache@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rmclure@linux.ibm.com,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
wilts.infradead.org@pedro-suse.lan, ziy@nvidia.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, kas@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 11:01:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahlh2vdHEGo6ZSot@pedro-suse.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528165635.2068012-3-usama.arif@linux.dev>
On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 09:55:20AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> The force_thp_readahead path in do_sync_mmap_readahead() is gated on
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER and always requests
> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER / HPAGE_PMD_NR. On configurations where HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> exceeds MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER, notably arm64 with a 64K base page size,
> VM_HUGEPAGE mappings cannot use this path and fall back to the non-forced
> mmap readahead path even when the mapping supports useful large folios.
>
> Keep the existing PMD-sized behavior when HPAGE_PMD_ORDER fits in the
> page cache. When it does not, enable forced readahead for mappings that
> support large folios and request an order capped by both
> mapping_max_folio_order(mapping) and 2MB.
>
> 2MB is chosen as the cap because it matches the PMD size on x86_64
> and on arm64 with 4K or 16K base pages, so the size/memory-pressure
16K base page size's PMDs should be 32M, no? Am I misunderstanding what
you mean here?
> tradeoff for folios of that size is already well understood. On arm64
> with a 64K base page size, 2MB is also the contiguous-PTE (contpte)
> block size, so the resulting folios coalesce into a single TLB entry
> and reduce TLB pressure on the readahead path.
>
> The final allocation order may still be clamped by page_cache_ra_order()
> to the mapping and request geometry, but this gives VM_HUGEPAGE mappings
> on such configurations a large-folio readahead request instead of
> dropping back to base-page readahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index a16b33e0fc71..bfb891d9da1f 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3312,14 +3312,23 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> struct file *fpin = NULL;
> vm_flags_t vm_flags = vmf->vma->vm_flags;
> bool force_thp_readahead = false;
> + unsigned int thp_order = 0;
> unsigned short mmap_miss;
>
> ractl._max_index = vmf->vma->vm_pgoff + vma_pages(vmf->vma) - 1;
>
> /* Use the readahead code, even if readahead is disabled */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) &&
> - (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE) && HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
> - force_thp_readahead = true;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)) {
> + if (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER) {
> + force_thp_readahead = true;
> + thp_order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
> + } else if (mapping_large_folio_support(mapping)) {
> + force_thp_readahead = true;
> + thp_order = min_t(unsigned int,
> + mapping_max_folio_order(mapping),
> + get_order(SZ_2M));
This looks somewhat arbitrary to me (as does the old logic). It seems more
natural (correct?) to do this:
if (THP_ENABLED && (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)) {
if (mapping_large_folio_support(mapping)) {
force_thp_readahead = true;
/*
* Cap THP readahead to either the max folio order the
* mapping supports, or the max order the page cache
* supports (useless to try more), or the hugepage PMD
* order (CPU can't benefit from larger).
*/
thp_order = min3(mapping_max_folio_order(mapping),
MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
}
}
> + }
> + }
>
> if (!force_thp_readahead) {
> /*
> @@ -3354,17 +3363,19 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> }
>
> if (force_thp_readahead) {
> + unsigned long folio_nr_pages = 1UL << thp_order;
> +
> fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(vmf, fpin);
> - ractl._index &= ~((unsigned long)HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1);
> - ra->size = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> + ractl._index &= ~(folio_nr_pages - 1);
> + ra->size = folio_nr_pages;
> /*
> - * Fetch two PMD folios, so we get the chance to actually
> + * Fetch two folios so we get the chance to actually
^^ large folios?
> * readahead, unless we've been told not to.
> */
> if (!(vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ))
> ra->size *= 2;
> - ra->async_size = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> - ra->order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
> + ra->async_size = folio_nr_pages;
> + ra->order = thp_order;
This part LGTM.
--
Pedro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 16:55 [PATCH v6 0/2] mm: improve large folio readahead for exec memory Usama Arif
2026-05-28 16:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: bypass mmap_miss heuristic for VM_EXEC readahead Usama Arif
2026-05-29 9:47 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-05-28 16:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order Usama Arif
2026-05-29 10:01 ` Pedro Falcato [this message]
2026-05-29 12:19 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-29 13:40 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-05-29 14:11 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-29 12:36 ` Usama Arif
2026-05-28 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] mm: improve large folio readahead for exec memory Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahlh2vdHEGo6ZSot@pedro-suse.lan \
--to=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=r@hev.cc \
--cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=wilts.infradead.org@pedro-suse.lan \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox