From: Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: drop redundant mmap_read_lock from damon_va_three_regions
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:32:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiY3tCGC06k46wOG@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260607173644.93883-1-sj@kernel.org>
On Sun, Jun 07, 2026 at 10:36:44AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hello Cunlong,
>
> On Sun, 07 Jun 2026 21:48:52 +0800 Cunlong Li <shenxiaogll@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > __damon_va_three_regions() already walks VMAs under rcu_read_lock(), so
> > the outer mmap_read_lock() is no longer needed.
>
> The function aims to read a snapshot of the virtual address space. So I think
> mmap_read_lock() is still required. Please let me know if I'm missing
> something.
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
Yes — I understand this path is meant to obtain a snapshot of the VMA layout.
My thinking was that an exact snapshot may not be required here, and
the RCU-protected traversal inside __damon_va_three_regions() already
makes the walk safe, so the outer mmap_read_lock() might be redundant.
But, if we want a consistent VMA layout here, mmap_read_lock() is the
right mechanism and rcu_read_lock() alone is not enough. I'll drop
the patch :)
Thanks,
Cunlong
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-07 13:48 [PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: drop redundant mmap_read_lock from damon_va_three_regions Cunlong Li
2026-06-07 17:36 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-08 3:32 ` Cunlong Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiY3tCGC06k46wOG@debian \
--to=shenxiaogll@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox