From: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
To: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/mm: fix exclusive_cow test fork() handling
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:59:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiovwpe5DVT8sXwW@parvat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611034102.1030738-4-aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 09:11:02AM +0530, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:
> The test ignores the return value of fork(), so both the parent and
> the (newly created) child run the COW verification loops and then
> call hmm_buffer_free() before returning into the kselftest harness,
> which _exit()s each side. This duplicated teardown sequence has
> been observed to manifest as a SIGSEGV in the test child, e.g.:
>
> hmm-tests[360141]: segfault (11) at 0 nip 10006964 lr 1000ac3c code 1
> in hmm-tests[6964,10000000+30000]
>
Thanks for catching this!
> Fix this by adopting the same fork()-then-wait pattern already used
> by the nearby anon_write_child / anon_write_child_shared tests in
> this file: the child performs the COW verification and then _exit(0)s
> so it does not run the test teardown, while the parent independently
> verifies COW, waits for the child, and only then frees the buffer.
>
> Fixes: b659baea75469 ("mm: selftests for exclusive device memory")
> Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> index 8f4f82467043..e4c49699f3f7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hmm-tests.c
> @@ -1884,6 +1884,8 @@ TEST_F(hmm, exclusive_cow)
> unsigned long i;
> int *ptr;
> int ret;
> + pid_t pid;
> + int status;
>
> npages = ALIGN(HMM_BUFFER_SIZE, self->page_size) >> self->page_shift;
> ASSERT_NE(npages, 0);
> @@ -1912,14 +1914,37 @@ TEST_F(hmm, exclusive_cow)
> ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
> ASSERT_EQ(buffer->cpages, npages);
>
> - fork();
> + pid = fork();
> + if (pid == -1)
> + ASSERT_EQ(pid, 0);
>
> - /* Fault pages back to system memory and check them. */
> + if (pid == 0) {
> + /*
> + * Child verifies COW independently, then _exit(0)s so it does
> + * not run the test teardown. A failed ASSERT_* here makes the
> + * harness abort() the child, so the parent sees
> + * !WIFEXITED(status) below and fails in turn.
> + */
> + for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->ptr; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> + ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i]++, i);
> +
> + for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->ptr; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> + ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i], i + 1);
> +
> + _exit(0);
> + }
> +
> + /* Parent: also increment to verify COW works for both processes. */
> for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->ptr; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i]++, i);
>
> for (i = 0, ptr = buffer->ptr; i < size / sizeof(*ptr); ++i)
> - ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i], i+1);
> + ASSERT_EQ(ptr[i], i + 1);
> +
> + /* Parent: wait for child and then free the buffer. */
> + ASSERT_EQ(waitpid(pid, &status, 0), pid);
> + ASSERT_TRUE(WIFEXITED(status));
> + ASSERT_EQ(WEXITSTATUS(status), 0);
>
> hmm_buffer_free(buffer);
> }
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 3:40 [PATCH v3 0/3] selftests/mm: assorted fixes for hmm-tests Aboorva Devarajan
2026-06-11 3:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] selftests/mm: allow PUD-level entries in compound testcase of hmm tests Aboorva Devarajan
2026-06-11 3:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] selftests/mm: remove hardcoded THP sizing assumptions in " Aboorva Devarajan
2026-06-11 3:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/mm: fix exclusive_cow test fork() handling Aboorva Devarajan
2026-06-11 4:59 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiovwpe5DVT8sXwW@parvat \
--to=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.sierra@amd.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox