Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memfd_luo: validate serialized_data before conversion
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:28:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <airGIioUmTtU9326@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2vxzmrx1qjuf.fsf@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 03:37:12PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11 2026, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 10:30:03AM +0000, Tarun Sahu wrote:
> >> In memfd_luo_finish() and memfd_luo_retrieve(), phys_to_virt() was called
> >> on args->serialized_data before checking if the physical address is valid.
> >> Since physical address 0 does not map to virtual NULL (due to direct
> >> mapping offsets), the subsequent check 'if (!ser)' was ineffective at
> >> catching a missing serialized_data, leading to unsafe dereferences later.
> >> 
> >> Validate that args->serialized_data is non-zero before calling
> >> phys_to_virt().
> >> 
> >> Fixes: b3749f174d68 ("mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd")
> >> Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/memfd_luo.c | 10 ++++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> >> index 59de210bee5f..10f3983b0060 100644
> >> --- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
> >> +++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> >> @@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ static void memfd_luo_finish(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> >>  	if (args->retrieve_status)
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >> -	ser = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data);
> >> -	if (!ser)
> >> +	if (!args->serialized_data)
> >
> > We really should make args->serialized_data a KHOSER_PTR
> 
> Hmm, that would also be a good idea. I suppose then it would be a better
> to directly convert to using KHOSER_PTR() instead of this patch?

Makes sense.
 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11 10:30 [PATCH] mm/memfd_luo: validate serialized_data before conversion Tarun Sahu
2026-06-11 12:32 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-11 12:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-11 13:37   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-06-11 14:28     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-06-11 18:11       ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-06-11 18:11 ` Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=airGIioUmTtU9326@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox