From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: initialize *locked in memcg1_oom_prepare() stub
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:25:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj8XjtMqwAQM2XNd@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626-memcg-oom-uninit-locked-v1-1-a00175936b39@debian.org>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 05:43:02AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> mem_cgroup_oom() passes an uninitialized "locked" to memcg1_oom_prepare()
> and reads it back in memcg1_oom_finish():
>
> bool locked, ret;
> ...
> if (!memcg1_oom_prepare(memcg, &locked))
> return false;
> ret = mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order);
> memcg1_oom_finish(memcg, locked);
>
> This relies on memcg1_oom_prepare() setting *locked whenever it returns
> true. The CONFIG_MEMCG_V1=y version does, but the stub used when
> CONFIG_MEMCG_V1=n returns true without touching *locked, so
> memcg1_oom_finish() consumes an uninitialized value.
On CONFIG_MEMCG_V1=n, memcg1_oom_finish() is an empty function and I assume
compiler will just remove it completely. Maybe on CONFIG_UBSAN=y kernel,
compiler is not removing memcg1_oom_finish90.
> On a memcg OOM this
> is reported by UBSAN:
>
> UBSAN: invalid-load in mm/memcontrol.c:1932:27
> load of value 0 is not a valid value for type 'bool' (aka '_Bool')
>
> Initialize *locked to false in the stub; with cgroup v1 compiled out
> there is no OOM lock to take.
>
> Fixes: e93d4166b40a ("mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-specific code under a config option")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Anyways, this is not a performance critical code path, so this is fine.
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-27 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 12:43 [PATCH] mm: memcg: initialize *locked in memcg1_oom_prepare() stub Breno Leitao
2026-06-26 13:56 ` Joshua Hahn
2026-06-26 14:23 ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-26 18:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-06-27 0:04 ` SeongJae Park
2026-06-27 0:25 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj8XjtMqwAQM2XNd@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox