Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Farhad Alemi <farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Farhad Alemi <falemi@asu.edu>, Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>,
	Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup/cpuset: rebind mm mempolicy to effective_mems, not mems_allowed
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:44:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajFTVaMBeu-ViGIC@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51eafe6c-6622-479b-b391-6d3ff9350e75@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 08:59:07AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 6/16/26 05:43, Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 6/15/26 10:26 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> The reason why I am suggesting to use cs->effective_mems to keep the old
> >> cgroup v1 behavior. If the consensus is to use the output of
> >> guarantee_online_mems() for mpol_rebind_mm(), I will not be against that but
> >> it will be a slight change in user-visible behavior.

I'm not grok'ing what is user-visible here.

The two values should effectively be equivalent because we're
using this value to constrain mpol's during a hotplug event.

If the values differed, you would be saying there's a race condition
that could affect correctness of the rebind (which can't happen,
because this whole thing is done under the hotplug lock btw).

Can you help me understand?

~Gregory


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 19:03 [PATCH] mm: don't allow empty relative nodemask in mpol_relative_nodemask() Yury Norov
2026-05-28 19:37 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-28 19:40   ` Yury Norov
2026-05-28 19:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-28 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-29 15:26   ` Joshua Hahn
2026-05-29 17:47     ` Yury Norov
2026-05-29 18:40       ` Joshua Hahn
2026-06-01 14:32       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-02  8:44         ` Gregory Price
2026-06-02  9:19           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-02  9:54             ` Gregory Price
2026-06-02 15:01               ` Farhad Alemi
2026-06-05 15:18                 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-09 23:57                   ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: rebind mm mempolicy to effective_mems, not mems_allowed Farhad Alemi
2026-06-10  0:53                     ` Andrew Morton
2026-06-10 11:34                     ` Gregory Price
2026-06-11  2:50                     ` Waiman Long
2026-06-14 13:25                     ` [PATCH v2] " Farhad Alemi
2026-06-15  8:08                       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-15  9:38                         ` Gregory Price
2026-06-15 11:08                           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-15 11:19                             ` Gregory Price
2026-06-15 11:39                               ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
     [not found]                           ` <70f486ce-5ef6-4d72-8cc3-7086f4eea930@redhat.com>
     [not found]                             ` <c1495b1b-9dee-4cd5-ac8e-eeb7a2d968ed@redhat.com>
     [not found]                               ` <51eafe6c-6622-479b-b391-6d3ff9350e75@kernel.org>
2026-06-16 13:44                                 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-06-16 15:27                                   ` Waiman Long
2026-06-16 15:23                                 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-29  8:47 ` [PATCH] mm: don't allow empty relative nodemask in mpol_relative_nodemask() kernel test robot
2026-05-29  8:58 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-29 12:45 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-29 12:47 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-01 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajFTVaMBeu-ViGIC@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=falemi@asu.edu \
    --cc=farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox