From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Kaitao Cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/vmalloc: honor GFP constraints in pcpu_get_vm_areas()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:02:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajI4a0BvAlFHihJx@palisades.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612022648.13008-2-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 10:26:46AM +0800, Kaitao Cheng wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> pcpu_alloc_noprof() derives pcpu_gfp from the caller supplied GFP mask
> and passes it down to the backing percpu allocator. However, when the
> percpu vmalloc allocator has to create a new chunk, pcpu_create_chunk()
> calls pcpu_get_vm_areas() to allocate the corresponding vmalloc areas.
>
> pcpu_get_vm_areas() currently performs its internal allocations with
> GFP_KERNEL, including vmap area metadata, vm_struct metadata and KASAN
> vmalloc shadow population. This means that a caller which deliberately
> uses GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO can still enter FS or IO reclaim while creating
> the vmalloc areas for a new percpu chunk.
>
> One possible case is blk-cgroup after commit 5d726c4dbeed
> ("blk-cgroup: fix possible deadlock while configuring policy").
> blkg_conf_prep() now serializes against blkcg_deactivate_policy() with
> q->blkcg_mutex, and blkg_alloc() was changed to GFP_NOIO for that reason:
>
> CPU0: blkg_conf_prep()
> mutex_lock(q->blkcg_mutex)
> blkg_alloc(..., GFP_NOIO)
> alloc_percpu_gfp(..., GFP_NOIO)
> pcpu_alloc_noprof(..., GFP_NOIO)
> pcpu_create_chunk(GFP_NOIO)
> pcpu_get_vm_areas()
> -> if percpu chunks are exhausted, chunk create may do
> internal GFP_KERNEL allocations
> -> direct reclaim / writeback can issue IO to this queue
> -> IO waits because the queue is frozen
>
> CPU1: blkcg_deactivate_policy()
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(q)
> mutex_lock(q->blkcg_mutex)
> -> waits for CPU0
> ... unfreeze only happens after q->blkcg_mutex is acquired/released
>
> So the concern is that the caller deliberately uses GFP_NOIO because it
> may hold a lock which can be acquired after queue freeze, but the percpu
> slow path can temporarily lose that allocation context.
>
> Pass the caller supplied GFP mask from pcpu_create_chunk() to
> pcpu_get_vm_areas(), and use it for the internal vmalloc metadata and
> KASAN shadow allocations.
>
> Fixes: 9a5b183941b5 ("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic")
> Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Dennis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 2:26 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/percpu: Fix possible NOFS/NOIO reclaim recursion Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-12 2:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/vmalloc: honor GFP constraints in pcpu_get_vm_areas() Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-17 6:02 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
2026-06-12 2:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/percpu: honor GFP constraints when populating chunks Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-17 6:29 ` Dennis Zhou
2026-06-12 2:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/percpu: Avoid IO/FS reclaim in backing allocations Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-17 6:53 ` Dennis Zhou
2026-06-17 8:56 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-06-17 7:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/percpu: Fix possible NOFS/NOIO reclaim recursion Dennis Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajI4a0BvAlFHihJx@palisades.local \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox