From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: JP Kobryn <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, fvdl@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: use existing highatomic reserves on the buddy fastpath
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:35:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajQ6bY8R1sOy9X52@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617234958.150339-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 04:49:58PM -0700, JP Kobryn wrote:
> ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC currently provides both access to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC free
> pages and permission to create new highatomic pageblock reserves. This
> makes it unsuitable for the fastpath.
>
> However, the fastpath can reach rmqueue_buddy() while MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC
> reserves have free pages available. In this situation, the allocation can
> fall back to other migratetypes without trying those reserves first.
>
> Allow high-priority non-blocking allocations above order-0 and up to the
> costly order to use existing MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC reserves on the buddy
> fastpath. Change the semantics of ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC so that it only allows
> access to the reserves without permission to grow them. Add a new flag
> ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE that specifically allows growing the reserves.
>
> A UDP receive workload was run with free MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC pageblocks
> available in the target zone. Before this patch, the workload did not
> consume these blocks. With this patch, eligible order-1 allocations
> reaching the buddy path consumed existing MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC pageblocks,
> with no highatomic misses observed. The workload did not grow highatomic
> reserves and NAPI page-frag allocations remained healthy with no failures
> or order-0 fallbacks.
Thanks for digging deeper into this! That's a great find.
> Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - decouple use semantics from ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE
> - update changelog to reflect above change and reword test paragraph
> - adjust comment in PCP path
> - rebase onto Linus' tree ~v7.2-rc1
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260616191420.52556-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev/
>
> mm/internal.h | 1 +
> mm/page_alloc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 5a2ddcf68e0b..6700659615e8 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -1478,6 +1478,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
> #define ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC 0x200 /* Allows access to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC */
> #define ALLOC_TRYLOCK 0x400 /* Only use spin_trylock in allocation path */
> #define ALLOC_KSWAPD 0x800 /* allow waking of kswapd, __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM set */
> +#define ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE 0x1000 /* Allows growing MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC reserves */
>
> /* Flags that allow allocations below the min watermark. */
> #define ALLOC_RESERVES (ALLOC_NON_BLOCK|ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_OOM)
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index d49c254174da..ed919e2ac99a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3238,7 +3238,7 @@ struct page *rmqueue_buddy(struct zone *preferred_zone, struct zone *zone,
> * If this is a high-order atomic allocation then check
> * if the pageblock should be reserved for the future
> */
> - if (unlikely(alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC))
> + if (unlikely(alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE))
> reserve_highatomic_pageblock(page, order, zone);
You could check ALLOC_WMARK_MIN to determine the slowpath. This way
you wouldn't need another alloc flag:
/* Slowpath (precarious) high-atomic allocation. Maybe reserve block */
if (unlikely((alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_WMARK_MIN)) == (ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_WMARK_MIN)))
reserve_highatomic_pageblock(page, order, zone);
[ we really ought to generalize gfp_has_flags() ... ]
> __count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, page_zonenum(page), 1 << order);
> @@ -3320,8 +3320,9 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> *
> * Instead, direct it towards the reserves by
> * returning NULL, which will make the caller fall
> - * back to rmqueue_buddy. This will try to use the
> - * reserves first and grow them if needed.
> + * back to rmqueue_buddy. There it will try to use
> + * the reserves first and grow them if needed and
> + * permitted by the ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE flag.
> */
> if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC)
> return NULL;
> @@ -3768,6 +3769,24 @@ alloc_flags_nofragment(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> return alloc_flags;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Let high-priority non-blocking allocations above order-0 and up
> + * to the costly order try to use existing MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC
> + * reserves on the fastpath.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int
> +alloc_flags_highatomic_fastpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> +{
> + if (!order || order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> + return 0;
There seems to be a mismatch between this and gfp_to_alloc_flags()
(slowpath), where slowpath is still allowed to tap highatomic reserves
for costly orders. Is that on purpose?
> + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH))
> + return 0;
> + if (gfp_mask & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> + return 0;
This duplicates gfp_to_alloc_flags() logic which seems fragile. How
about the below:
> +
> + return ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC;
> +}
> +
> /* Must be called after current_gfp_context() which can change gfp_mask */
> static inline unsigned int gfp_to_alloc_flags_cma(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> unsigned int alloc_flags)
> @@ -4495,7 +4514,7 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NON_BLOCK;
>
> if (order > 0 && (alloc_flags & ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE))
> - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC;
> + alloc_flags |= (ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC | ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC_RESERVE);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5215,7 +5234,8 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
> * Forbid the first pass from falling back to types that fragment
> * memory until all local zones are considered.
> */
> - alloc_flags |= alloc_flags_nofragment(zonelist_zone(ac.preferred_zoneref), gfp);
> + alloc_flags |= alloc_flags_nofragment(zonelist_zone(ac.preferred_zoneref), gfp) |
> + alloc_flags_highatomic_fastpath(alloc_gfp, order);
alloc_flags |= gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp, order) & ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC;
Or factor gfp_to_alloc_flags_nonblocking() from gfp_to_alloc_flags()
and reuse that here, to save a few cycles in the fast path.
> /* First allocation attempt */
> page = get_page_from_freelist(alloc_gfp, order, alloc_flags, &ac);
> --
> 2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 23:49 [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: use existing highatomic reserves on the buddy fastpath JP Kobryn
2026-06-18 18:35 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2026-06-19 21:45 ` JP Kobryn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajQ6bY8R1sOy9X52@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox