From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Shivaji Kant <shivajikant@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] nfs: Optimize direct I/O to use folios for requests
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 11:47:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak44z-X-SKKhkBkg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ak4A6IEmWNi27I2d@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 12:48:56AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 12:08:27PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > Ack. I see! Thanks!
> >
> > Regarding the page_folio impasse, how do you suggest we proceed? Should
> > I expose and use get_contig_folio_len() from bvec? Or should I move the
> > NFS helper into the iov_iter lib? (or both).
>
> Sounds like the best way forward for now.
Ack. I'll reuse get_contig_folio len and move the nfs extractor to
iov_iter for v3.
>
> > Also, do you suggest sending the Folio move as a standalone patch if it
> > is blocking the rest of the series or do we prefer keeping these in a
> > single series?
>
> Sorry if I'm thick, but I'm not sure what "folio" move means. In doubt
> if you think you can get a series merged quicker without a later part
> I'd split it.
Apologies for being unclear. I meant I could post a standalone series
that moves NFS Direct I/O to folio, i.e. break out Patches 6 & 7 to
another series, if that makes sense?
Thanks,
Praan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260616134000.2733403-1-praan@google.com>
[not found] ` <20260616134000.2733403-7-praan@google.com>
[not found] ` <7ee3bcfdd6126c93cbb1c219bf601182b95c10d9.camel@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <ajGGpDvzZdkGtSbN@google.com>
2026-06-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] nfs: Optimize direct I/O to use folios for requests Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-18 18:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-06-19 12:32 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-26 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-03 12:46 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-07-03 14:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-07 12:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-07-08 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-08 11:47 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak44z-X-SKKhkBkg@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shivajikant@google.com \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox