Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Convert x86 pgd_lists to ptdescs
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:48:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akvqdoZI-jCn3lrk@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629185742.126987-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:57:33AM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote:
> This continues the ptdesc conversions for x86[1]. This is a necessary step
> in preparation for the separate allocation of ptdescs from struct page.
> Once ptdescs are not wrappers, the pgd_list should be used to find our
> ptdesc, not page.
> 
> In fact, after patch 4 we can successfully boot a 32-bit x86 kernel
> that separately allocates ptdescs.
> 
> All of the patches are rather straightforward, I just kept them split up
> for ease of review. There are no intended functional changes as ptdescs
> are currently still wrappers around struct page.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260211195233.368497-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com/
> 
> ----------------
> 
> v2:
>   - Collect Review tags
>   - Rebase on 7.2-rc1
> 
> I've compiled and booted both 64 and 32 bit on a kernel with separately
> allocated ptdescs. I ensured the codepaths were hit for all the changes
> except Xen.
> 
> This applies cleanly to 7.2-rc1. Dave, can you please take this through
> the x86 mm tree?

Hi Dave, will you take this through your tree? Let me know if there
are any changes you'd like to see, or if you'd rather this go through
some other tree.

> Vishal Moola (9):
>   x86/mm/pat: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of ifdef
>   x86/mm/pat: Convert __set_pmd_pte() to ptdescs
>   x86/mm/pat: Convert collapse_pmd_page() to ptdescs
>   x86/mm: Convert arch_sync_kernel_mappings() to ptdescs
>   x86/mm: Convert sync_global_pgds_l5() to ptdescs
>   x86/mm: Convert sync_global_pgds_l4() to ptdescs
>   x86/mm: Convert pgd_page_get_mm() to ptdescs
>   x86/xen: Convert xen_mm_pin_all() to ptdescs
>   x86/xen: Convert xen_mm_unpin_all() to ptdescs
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h       |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c                  |  8 ++++----
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c                | 16 ++++++++--------
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c         | 17 ++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c                | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  7 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 18:57 [PATCH v2 0/9] Convert x86 pgd_lists to ptdescs Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] x86/mm/pat: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of ifdef Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] x86/mm/pat: Convert __set_pmd_pte() to ptdescs Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] x86/mm/pat: Convert collapse_pmd_page() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/mm: Convert arch_sync_kernel_mappings() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/mm: Convert sync_global_pgds_l5() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86/mm: Convert sync_global_pgds_l4() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] x86/mm: Convert pgd_page_get_mm() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] x86/xen: Convert xen_mm_pin_all() " Vishal Moola
2026-06-29 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/xen: Convert xen_mm_unpin_all() " Vishal Moola
2026-07-06 17:48 ` Vishal Moola [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akvqdoZI-jCn3lrk@fedora \
    --to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox