From: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/pat: allocate split page tables as kernel page tables
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:10:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al-n-Eos9mc_7lvd@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721-fix-cpa-kernel-pagetables-v2-1-2b255deed710@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 01:14:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> When splitting a large page in CPA in __split_large_page() we allocate a
> PTE directly without going through the standard page table allocation
> routines such as pte_alloc_one_kernel().
>
> This means the page table constructor is never called nor is the page table
> marked as a kernel page table.
>
> The former results in the folio associated with the page table not being
> marked as a page table (__pagetable_ctor() is never called thus neither is
> __folio_set_pgtable()) nor are statistics updated to reflect
> it (lruvec_stat_add_folio() is never called).
>
> The latter issue of failing to mark the page table as a kernel page
> table (ptdesc_set_kernel() is never called) is far more problematic.
>
> Since commit 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page
> tables") kernel page table freeing has been batched and since the
> subsequent commit e37d5a2d60a3 ("iommu/sva: invalidate stale IOTLB entries
> for kernel address space") IOTLB cache entries for kernel page tables have
> been invalidated upon being freed.
>
> Since split page tables are freed without this invalidation, the IOTLB can
> contain stale entries for them.
>
> Resolve the issue by using the ordinary PTE allocation API at split time.
>
> This results in these kernel page tables invoking a page table constructor,
> and thus requires a page table destructor.
>
> Since we cannot assume one is always present (early allocated direct map
> page tables are not marked as such), we conditionally call
> pagetable_dtor_free() if the PG_table folio flag for the ptdesc is set,
> otherwise we free the page table via pagetable_free().
>
> Regardless of which path is taken page tables marked as kernel page tables,
> which now includes split page tables, take the correct route through
> pagetable_free_kernel().
>
> There is a user-visible side effect in that split page tables will appear
> in nr_page_table_pages in /proc/vmstat (as do other kernel page tables
> allocated after early boot), however this is a positive change.
>
> This issue started being markedly problematic after commit
> 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables") so
> choose this as the Fixes target.
>
> Fixes: 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 12:14 [PATCH v2] x86/mm/pat: allocate split page tables as kernel page tables Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-07-21 17:10 ` Vishal Moola [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al-n-Eos9mc_7lvd@fedora \
--to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox