From: Guillaume Morin <gemorin@debian.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>,
osalvador@suse.de, avid@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
riel@surriel.com, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [BUG] mm/hugetlb: possible temporary resv underflow
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:39:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alYR0NXacVVKKstj@bender.morinfr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alSyhslcItgtqSHT@gmail.com>
Hello Breno,
On 13 Jul 2:43, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've encountered a temporary underflow in the reserved count after a fork when
> > a parent unmaps a faulted hugetlb page before a child process.
> >
> > After a reservation is consumed (i.e the page is faulted), if there is a fork()
> > and the parent munmaps the page before the child, the reserved count
> > underflows. The count is restored when the child unmaps the page/exits. I have
> > reproduced the issue in 6.12.95 and 6.18.38. I believe it's still present in
> > 7.2-rc2 but didn't try to reproduce.
>
> Thanks for the detailed report and the reproducer.
>
> I reproduced the underflow on current linux-next (7.2.0-rc2-next-20260710)
> with your program — it fires on every run. I also confirmed your
> folio_mapcount() == 0 check fixes it: with it applied the underflow is gone
> across many runs, and the existing hugetlb reservation selftests still pass.
>
> > The patch that seems to have introduced the issue is df7a6d1f6405, "mm/hugetlb:
> > restore the reservation if needed"
> >
> > I am not sure what the best fix is but checking folio_mapcount() == 0
> > in __unmap_hugepage_range() seems to do the trick
> >
> > adjust_reservation = false;
> >
> > spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > if (!h->surplus_huge_pages && __vma_private_lock(vma) &&
> > - folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> > + folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> > + folio_mapcount(folio) == 0) {
> > folio_set_hugetlb_restore_reserve(page_folio(page));
> > /* Reservation to be adjusted after the spin lock */
> > adjust_reservation = true;
>
> The fix looks correct to me.
Excellent! Will you be submitting a patch or do you need me to do
something there?
> > Reproducer (it only works if HugePages_Rsvd is 0 at the beginning of the test)
>
> Would you be up for turning your reproducer into an expansion of the selftest
> I've added a while ago for the fix I've added a while ago:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
>
> Your case is a nice complement to it, so it'd be great to have it there.
I've never used the selftest API but I gave it a shot. Hopefully it's a
decent first try
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.c
index 2eab2110ac6a..02323389df39 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <ctype.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <limits.h>
@@ -449,6 +450,34 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_free_pages(unsigned long size)
return read_num(path);
}
+bool hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(unsigned long *num)
+{
+ const char* field = "HugePages_Rsvd: ";
+ FILE *f = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
+ char line[256];
+
+ if (!f) {
+ ksft_perror("Could not open /proc/meminfo");
+ return false;
+ }
+ while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), f)) {
+ if (strncmp(line, field, strlen(field)))
+ continue;
+ const char *p = line + strlen(field);
+ while (*p && isspace(*p))
+ ++p;
+ if (!*p) {
+ break;
+ }
+ *num = strtoul(p, NULL, 10);
+ fclose(f);
+ return true;
+ }
+ fclose(f);
+ ksft_perror("could not parse /proc/meminfo");
+ return false;
+}
+
static bool __hugetlb_setup(unsigned long size, unsigned long nr)
{
unsigned long free = hugetlb_free_pages(size);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.h
index 726c73c43c05..a73146c8e4a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage_settings.h
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ unsigned long default_huge_page_size(void);
unsigned long hugetlb_nr_pages(unsigned long size);
void hugetlb_set_nr_pages(unsigned long size, unsigned long nr);
unsigned long hugetlb_free_pages(unsigned long size);
+bool hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(unsigned long *num);
static inline void hugetlb_save_settings(void)
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
index f94549efcc6f..f3ee3aa49322 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
@@ -15,13 +15,20 @@
*
* Touching the first page after thread3's allocation will raise a SIGBUS
*
+ * We setup a 2nd test where we create a child process, then unmap the page in
+ * the parent while the child waits and verify that there is no underflow
+ * of the reserved count.
+ *
* Author: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
*/
+#include <limits.h>
#include <pthread.h>
+#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "vm_util.h"
@@ -86,7 +93,7 @@ int main(void)
int max = 10;
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(1);
+ ksft_set_plan(3);
if (!hugetlb_setup_default_exact(1))
ksft_exit_skip("This test needs one and only one page to execute. Got %lu\n",
@@ -120,5 +127,88 @@ int main(void)
}
ksft_test_result_pass("No unexpected huge page allocations\n");
+ huge_ptr = mmap(NULL, mmap_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0);
+
+ if ((unsigned long)huge_ptr == -1)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to allocate huge page\n");
+
+ {
+ pid_t pid;
+ int pipe_fds[2];
+ unsigned long nr_reserved = 0;
+ if (!hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(&nr_reserved))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Cannot read number of reserved pages\n");
+ else if (nr_reserved != 1)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected number of reserved pages: %lu, expected 1\n",
+ nr_reserved);
+
+ /* Force the fault to ensure the reservation is consumed */
+ *huge_ptr = 0;
+ if (!hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(&nr_reserved))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Cannot read number of reserved pages\n");
+ else if (nr_reserved != 0)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected number of reserved pages: %lu, expected 0\n",
+ nr_reserved);
+
+ if (pipe(pipe_fds) != 0) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("pipe failed");
+ }
+
+ pid = fork();
+ if (pid < 0) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("fork failed");
+ }
+
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ /* Child: Simply wait for the parent */
+ char b;
+ close(pipe_fds[1]);
+ if (read(pipe_fds[0], &b, 1) < 0) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("child read failed");
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Parent */
+ close(pipe_fds[0]);
+
+ /* First unmap, this will close the vma */
+ if (munmap(huge_ptr, mmap_size) != 0) {
+ kill(pid, SIGKILL);
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("munmap failed");
+ }
+
+ if (!hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(&nr_reserved))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Cannot read number of reserved pages\n");
+ if (nr_reserved == ULONG_MAX) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("After the munmap, HugePages_Rsvd underflowed!\n");
+ } else if (nr_reserved == 0) {
+ ksft_test_result_pass("Underflow not present!\n");
+ } else {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected HugePages_Rsvd=%ld after munmap, should "
+ "be 0 or -1. Repeat the test\n",
+ nr_reserved);
+ }
+ /* Make the child exit, this should restore HugePages_Rsvd to 0 */
+ if (write(pipe_fds[1], &nr_reserved, 1) < 0) {
+ kill(pid, SIGKILL);
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("write failed");
+ }
+ close(pipe_fds[1]);
+ if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) <= 0) {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("write failed");
+ }
+
+ if (!hugetlb_nr_resv_pages(&nr_reserved))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Cannot read number of reserved pages\n");
+ if (nr_reserved == 0) {
+ ksft_test_result_pass("After the child dies, HugePages_Rsvd is properly set to 0\n");
+ } else {
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected HugePages_Rsvd=%ld after "
+ "the child termination munmap, should be 0 or -1. "
+ "Repeat the test\n", nr_reserved);
+ }
+ }
ksft_finished();
}
--
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 15:02 [BUG] mm/hugetlb: possible temporary resv underflow Guillaume Morin
2026-07-13 9:43 ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-14 10:39 ` Guillaume Morin [this message]
2026-07-14 10:48 ` Guillaume Morin
2026-07-14 11:14 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alYR0NXacVVKKstj@bender.morinfr.org \
--to=gemorin@debian.org \
--cc=avid@kernel.org \
--cc=guillaume@morinfr.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox