From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Evangelos Petrongonas <epetron@amazon.de>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kho: align kho_scratch to MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES pages
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:04:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aljy_-Y7OT6s0kj0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178409777790.255896.16691338963510282908.b4-review@b4>
On 07-15 09:42, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> > I caught this crash:
> > BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ff19164fffff8328
> > RIP: 0010:__free_one_page+0x1a1/0x6b0
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > [<ffffffff913208bf>] free_one_page+0xaf/0x240
> > [<ffffffff93973288>] deferred_free_pages+0xa8/0xd0
> > [<ffffffff93971b4f>] deferred_init_memmap_chunk+0x10f/0x1b0
> > [<ffffffff9396e265>] padata_mt_helper+0x65/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff90fac402>] process_scheduled_works+0x202/0x410
> > [<ffffffff90fae739>] worker_thread+0x1f9/0x2d0
> > [<ffffffff90fb62fd>] kthread+0x27d/0x2f0
> > [<ffffffff90fae540>] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > [<ffffffff90fb6080>] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [<ffffffff90efdc55>] ret_from_fork+0x145/0x280
> > [<ffffffff90fb6080>] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [<ffffffff90e2e46a>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> > </TASK>
> >
> > deferred_init_memmap_chunk() works fine without KHO because free
> > regions will never be neighbors. However, with KHO, free memory
> > will be split into (free && scratch) and (free && !scratch).
> > KHO scratch is aligned to CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES (which on my setup
> > is equal to 1 << 9 pages) but buddy can look at the neighborhood of
> > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES pages (which is equal to 1 << 10 pages).
> > This sometimes crashes when one half of the neighborhood is being
> > initialized but the other part is yet to be initialized.
> >
> > To fix this, let's just align KHO scratch to MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES pages.
> >
> > Fixes: c6073743d0c7 ("kho: make preserved pages compatible with deferred struct page init")
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > index 4834a809985ab..50928aaa33710 100644
> > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,16 @@
> > #include "../kexec_internal.h"
> > #include "kexec_handover_internal.h"
> >
> > +/*
> > + * This is the minimal alignment required by deferred struct page init.
> > + * deferred_init_memmap_chunk frees memory to the buddy allocator, which looks
> > + * at the neighboring pages (up to MAX_PAGE_ORDER) to merge them.
> > + * If KHO scratch is not aligned to that value, buddy can access uninitialized
> > + * struct pages, which can cause a crash.
> > + */
> > +#define SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES (1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + MAX_PAGE_ORDER))
> > +static_assert(SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES >= CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
>
> Maybe make it a variable and set it at runtime?
> We won't need to worry about different confugurations that override
> MAX_ORDER and potentail divergence of pageblock size from MAX_ORDER in
Do those architectures reduce MAX_ORDER when they override it? I would
hope we could set the alignment once and make it large enough to work
everywhere, rather than depending on dynamic changes even during boot...
> the future.
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 20:51 [PATCH] kho: align kho_scratch to MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES pages Michal Clapinski
[not found] ` <178409777790.255896.16691338963510282908.b4-review@b4>
2026-07-15 16:34 ` Michał Cłapiński
2026-07-16 15:04 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-07-16 15:16 ` Michał Cłapiński
2026-07-16 21:06 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aljy_-Y7OT6s0kj0@google.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=epetron@amazon.de \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mclapinski@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox