From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx189.postini.com [74.125.245.189]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F3D86B004D for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:28:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:28:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: Common [00/16] Sl[auo]b: Common code rework V8 In-Reply-To: <501A8BE4.4060206@parallels.com> Message-ID: References: <20120801211130.025389154@linux.com> <501A3F1E.4060307@parallels.com> <501A8BE4.4060206@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > Which is then the patchset's fault. Since as I said, my call order is: > > kmem_cache_create() -> kmem_cache_destroy(). > > All allocs and frees are implicit. > > It also works okay both before the patches are applied, and with slab. Are you creating two identical caches? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org