linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm: Do not iterate over NR_CPUS in __zone_pcp_update()
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:33:26 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003091530230.11928@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100309122253.3f3d4a53.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:21:04 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > __zone_pcp_update() iterates over NR_CPUS instead of limiting the
> > access to the possible cpus. This might result in access to
> > uninitialized areas as the per cpu allocator only populates the per
> > cpu memory for possible cpus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3224,7 +3224,7 @@ static int __zone_pcp_update(void *data)
> >  	int cpu;
> >  	unsigned long batch = zone_batchsize(zone), flags;
> >
> > -	for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
> > +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		struct per_cpu_pageset *pset;
> >  		struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
>
> I'm having trouble working out whether we want to backport this into
> 2.6.33.x or earlier.  Help?

  given the above aesthetic mod, shouldn't that same change be applied
to *all* explicit loops of that form?  after all, checkpatch.pl warns
against it:

=====
# use of NR_CPUS is usually wrong
# ignore definitions of NR_CPUS and usage to define arrays as likely right
                if ($line =~ /\bNR_CPUS\b/ &&
                    $line !~ /^.\s*\s*#\s*if\b.*\bNR_CPUS\b/ &&
                    $line !~ /^.\s*\s*#\s*define\b.*\bNR_CPUS\b/ &&
                    $line !~ /^.\s*$Declare\s.*\[[^\]]*NR_CPUS[^\]]*\]/ &&
                    $line !~ /\[[^\]]*\.\.\.[^\]]*NR_CPUS[^\]]*\]/ &&
                    $line !~ /\[[^\]]*NR_CPUS[^\]]*\.\.\.[^\]]*\]/)
                {
                        WARN("usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(), num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc\n" . $herecurr);
                }
=====

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-09 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08  9:21 mm: Do not iterate over NR_CPUS in __zone_pcp_update() Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-08 13:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-09  2:06   ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-09 15:10     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 20:04       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-09 20:19         ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-08 15:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-08 16:09 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  6:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-09 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-09 20:33   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 20:33   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2010-03-09 20:55     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 21:02       ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1003091530230.11928@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).