linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	npiggin@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120800450.3237@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906121201490.30049@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>



On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>  
> +	if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> +		local_flags &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> +
> +	might_sleep_if(local_flags & __GFP_WAIT);

This is pointless.

You're doing the "might_sleep_if()" way too late. At that point, you've 
already lost 99% of all coverage, since now none of the cases of just 
finding a free slab entry on the list will ever trigger that 
"might_sleep()" case.

So you need to do this _early_, at the entry-point, not late, at cache 
re-fill time.

So rather than removing the might_sleep_if() at the early point, and then 
moving it to this late stage (because you only do the local_flags fixups 
late), you need to move the local-flags fixup early instead, and do the 
might_sleep_it() there.

The whole point of "might_sleep()" is that it triggers every time if 
something is called in the wrong context - not just for the cases where it 
actually _does_ sleep.

			Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12  8:13 [PATCH 2/2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12  9:21     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:24       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:45           ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 10:00               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:22             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12  9:49     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:52       ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12  9:54         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:38           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:07       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 10:11         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:15           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:30             ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 10:32               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:16                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:13             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:24               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:11           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:34             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:41               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:43                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:30               ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 21:42                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:41                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 11:09         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 15:04   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-12 15:05     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-19 14:59   ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 22:27     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 23:23       ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 23:50         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-20  0:28           ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-20  2:10             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-21  6:18               ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21  9:31                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:34                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25  9:56                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120800450.3237@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).