From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DB06B009E for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:13:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:12:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] HWPOISON: define VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to 0 when feature is disabled In-Reply-To: <20090612154525.GA14438@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20090611142239.192891591@intel.com> <20090611144430.414445947@intel.com> <20090612112258.GA14123@elte.hu> <20090612125741.GA6140@localhost> <20090612131754.GA32105@elte.hu> <20090612154525.GA14438@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Wu Fengguang , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , LKML , Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , Andi Kleen , "riel@redhat.com" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > What feels wrong to me is: kill a process and - in the case where > that process is restartable or expendable - suggest to the admin > that "everything is fine, we handled it just fine". That is absolutely _not_ how any real-life sysadmin would ever react. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org