Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Jianlin Shi <shijianlin11@foxmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, vbabka@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: only update lowmem_reserve_ratio on sysctl write
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 03:36:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <am2h82KoY9uT01oz@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_DB426A4AAD75DA751446F443770939B43205@qq.com>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 11:42:26AM +0800, Jianlin Shi wrote:
> lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler() ignores the return value of
> proc_dointvec_minmax() and always calls setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve(),
> even for read operations.
>
> Reading /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio should not recompute per-zone
> lowmem_reserve[] and totalreserve_pages.  Only do so when the sysctl is
> written, matching min_free_kbytes and watermark_scale_factor handlers.
> 
> Also propagate errors from proc_dointvec_minmax() instead of ignoring
> them.

This appears to be the primary user-visible effect. You send in "birds
are real", function returns success, values are unchanged. After this
patch you get a proper error code on this lie.

> Drop the manual "< 1 -> 0" sanitization loop in the handler and set
> .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO on the ctl_table entry so proc_dointvec_minmax()
> enforces the minimum on write (suggested by Vlastimil Babka).

That's a nice cleanup.

> Compatibility note:
> Previously a read also sanitized sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio[] and
> called setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve(), which rewrites each zone's
> lowmem_reserve[] and recalculates pgdat->totalreserve_pages /
> totalreserve_pages (visible via /proc/zoneinfo "protection" and used
> by page allocation fallback and dirty-limit accounting).  After this
> change only a write does that.  Documentation describes the meaning of
> the ratio and the derived protection pages, but does not document any
> read side-effect.
> 
> Worst case for odd userspace that treated a read as a refresh of those
> derived values: lowmem_reserve[] and totalreserve_pages remain at their
> last written/setup values until the next write of this sysctl, or until
> another existing updater runs (e.g. adjust_managed_page_count() on
> managed-page changes, or init/watermark setup paths).  Until then,
> allocation fallback into lower zones and per-node dirtyable memory
> (node_dirtyable_memory() subtracts pgdat->totalreserve_pages) may not
> reflect a refresh that such userspace expected from the read alone.
> Normal readers that only consume the ratio array are unaffected.

I don't understand this. Nothing actually changes? It just runs
through the calculations pointlessly, but using the same fixed
parameters (zone_managed_pages(), lowmem_reserve[], watermarks*).

* modulo the boost effect Vlastimil points out aside. Which seems
  worth fixing but it's a separate patch

So IMO the changelog should be:

1. Actually return error on bogus values - i.e. check if integers
   were parsed and bound to positive range instead of silent rounding
2. Don't pointlessly recalculate on read when inputs didn't change

> Changes in v2:
> - Add .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO to the ctl_table entry
> - Remove the manual sanitization loop (negative writes now return
>   -EINVAL instead of being silently coerced to 0)
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/tencent_FFD4F4D728AAE8A8AE0AF277A59854A29A06@qq.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianlin Shi <shijianlin11@foxmail.com>

Code looks good to me. With the changelog fixed,

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-01  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 10:32 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: only update lowmem_reserve_ratio on sysctl write Jianlin Shi
2026-07-30 15:28 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-31  3:36   ` Jianlin Shi
2026-07-31  3:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Jianlin Shi
2026-07-31  8:06   ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-08-01  7:36   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=am2h82KoY9uT01oz@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shijianlin11@foxmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox