Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	 Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	 Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.4 0/9] memcg: remove the v1 soft limit
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:27:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an2HYmJ57BCY_Zwt@lucifer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811203203.3456029-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> Syzbot reported [1] a set_mm_walk() warning from kswapd. Soft limit
> reclaim is the only thing that runs shrink_lruvec() from kswapd with a
> target memcg set, and thus the only way kswapd can reach
> lru_gen_shrink_lruvec() and in turn set_mm_walk(). The offender,
> mem_cgroup_shrink_node(), has long carried a "Only used by soft limit
> reclaim. Do not reuse for anything else." comment and a priority hack,
> and it simply never got taught about MGLRU.
>
> Rather than teach it, let's delete it. The v1 soft limit was deprecated
> in v6.12 by commit 569c4f62d84a ("memcg: initiate deprecation of v1
> soft limit"). Nobody has reported depending on it in the ~21 months
> since, and v2 has covered the same ground for a long time with
> memory.low and memory.min.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a7a6929.b50370da.49fe0.005e.GAE@google.com/ [1]
>
> Shakeel Butt (9):
>   memcg: make the v1 soft limit knob inert
>   memcg: remove v1 soft limit reclaim
>   memcg: remove mem_cgroup_shrink_node()
>   memcg: remove the soft limit reclaim tracepoints
>   memcg: remove the soft limit rbtree
>   memcg: remove lru_gen_soft_reclaim()
>   memcg: remove the per-node soft limit tree fields
>   memcg: remove mem_cgroup->soft_limit
>   memcg: simplify v1 event ratelimiting
>
>  .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst          |  49 +-
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h                    |  27 --
>  include/linux/mmzone.h                        |  30 +-
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h                 |  14 -
>  mm/internal.h                                 |   4 -
>  mm/memcontrol-v1.c                            | 435 ++----------------
>  mm/memcontrol-v1.h                            |  12 +-
>  mm/memcontrol.c                               |   7 +-
>  mm/vmscan.c                                   |  96 +---
>  9 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 608 deletions(-)

This is a gorgeous diffstat :)

Obviously not my area but looking over it, all LGTM so feel free to add:

Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

To the whole series!

>
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11 20:31 [PATCH for-7.4 0/9] memcg: remove the v1 soft limit Shakeel Butt
2026-08-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] memcg: make the v1 soft limit knob inert Shakeel Butt
2026-08-12 22:50   ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-12 23:40     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:22   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] memcg: remove v1 soft limit reclaim Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:24   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] memcg: remove mem_cgroup_shrink_node() Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:24   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] memcg: remove the soft limit reclaim tracepoints Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:25   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] memcg: remove the soft limit rbtree Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:25   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:32 ` [PATCH 6/9] memcg: remove lru_gen_soft_reclaim() Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:26   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:32 ` [PATCH 7/9] memcg: remove the per-node soft limit tree fields Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:27   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:32 ` [PATCH 8/9] memcg: remove mem_cgroup->soft_limit Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:27   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-11 20:32 ` [PATCH 9/9] memcg: simplify v1 event ratelimiting Shakeel Butt
2026-08-13  8:28   ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-13  9:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an2HYmJ57BCY_Zwt@lucifer \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox