On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 05:53:50PM +0200, Steffen Dirkwinkel wrote: > Hello, > > > On Tue, 2026-07-28 at 16:07 +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote: > > There are a couple of CPA fixes floating around: > > > > Denis Lunev fixed races between split and collapse of the large mappings: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260715183453.2381141-1-den@openvz.org > > We saw the error below and I was wondering if it might be related to these fixes > or a similar case that's unfixed still. Seems to have happened during concurrent > kernel module loading of kvm and i915 (similar to the case in the patch from > Denis Lunev). But we got it without KASAN and the stack looks a little > different. I was not able to reproduce this with a ~16 hour concurrent module > load unload loop so far. > > Kernel: v7.1.5, PREEMPT_RT, tainted because of /dev/msr access > CPU: Elkhart Lake Atom X6214RE, 2 cores, isolcpus=1-N > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:2644! > Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 559 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G S 7.1.5- > rt1-bhf-369933-f1a4ee1dd787 #1 PREEMPT_{RT,(lazy)} > Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC > RIP: 0010:__text_poke+0x356/0x3d0 > Call Trace: > > smp_text_poke_batch_finish+0x1aa/0x3a0 > ? vmx_switch_vmcs+0xc8/0xd0 [kvm_intel] > __static_call_transform+0xfa/0x1f0 > ? vmx_switch_vmcs+0xc8/0xd0 [kvm_intel] > ? __pfx_preempt_schedule_thunk+0x10/0x10 > arch_static_call_transform+0x57/0xa0 > ? vmx_switch_vmcs+0xc8/0xd0 [kvm_intel] > __static_call_init+0x1aa/0x230 > ? __SCT__tp_func_kvm_mmu_split_huge_page+0x8/0x8 > ? __SCT__tp_func_kvm_mmu_split_huge_page+0x8/0x8 > static_call_module_notify+0x11f/0x150 We're also observing something very similar downstream (https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1271202) on 7.1.3 kernels, on our QA infra. I wrote a patch that should fix it (I didn't get to test it yet, since this didn't hit mainline/stable yet), on top of this. Mike, do you mind throwing it on top of this series, or should I submit separately? -- Pedro