From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Hongru Zhang <zhanghongru06@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, david@kernel.org,
liam@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mhocko@suse.com, rppt@kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
zhanghongru@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] mm: allow page faults to request VMA-lock retry
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:00:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anMV_Kf6nqS1oKBA@lucifer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4x_ed4m57-8rZ53PBoGy-aa-z1thOvGOp7RAb2qP28dKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:13:49AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 8:32 PM Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 05:52:19PM +0800, Hongru Zhang wrote:
> > > From: Hongru Zhang <zhanghongru@xiaomi.com>
> > >
> > > Page faults handled under the per-VMA lock currently fall back to the
> > > mmap_lock path whenever handle_mm_fault() returns VM_FAULT_RETRY. This
> > > means that lower-level fault handlers have no way to tell the
> > > architecture fault handler that the retry can safely continue under the
> > > per-VMA lock.
> > >
> > > Add VM_FAULT_MAY_USE_VMA_LOCK as an advisory bit that can be returned
> >
> > I don't love that name or that faulting retry behaviour is _modified_ by a
> > value that indicates fault resolution state... ugh.
> >
> > It's kinda confusing things 'VM_FAULT_RETRY' is 'you have to retry this
> > fault'.
> >
> > 'VM_FAULT_MAY_...' is starting to bring in effectively configuration
> > options into it and that's kinda horrible.
> >
> > I mean is there any reason we shouldn't ALWAYS do this if a VMA lock was
> > used?
> >
> > It's not too expensive to do a single retry with the VMA lock before
> > falling back to the mmap lock.
> >
> > So maybe simplify like that?
> >
> > And like that this series becomes a single patch right?
>
> This is a brilliant idea. That's a genius insight, Lorenzo.
Haha thanks! :)
>
> I guess the conceptual model could simply be:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 45b99c3b1442..3592bcc9bbd7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> vm_fault_t fault;
> unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT;
> + bool vma_lock_retried = false;
>
> tsk = current;
> mm = tsk->mm;
> @@ -1331,6 +1332,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> if (!(flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER))
> goto lock_mmap;
>
> +vma_lock:
> vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, address);
> if (!vma)
> goto lock_mmap;
> @@ -1352,6 +1354,11 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR)
> flags |= FAULT_FLAG_TRIED;
>
> + if (!vma_lock_retried) {
> + vma_lock_retried = true;
> + goto vma_lock;
> + }
> +
> /* Quick path to respond to signals */
> if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) {
> if (!user_mode(regs))
>
I seem to remember Willy didn't love the idea of '1 more try with the VMA lock'
but this isn't _quite_ doing that.
If we spuriously can't get the VMA lock then this gives up immediately and goes
to the mmap logic without a retry, so we're not doing that on lock contention at
least.
(We could fix that with vma_start_read_unlocked() though which would handle
write lock contention by sleeping on mmap read lock until the VMA lock can be
obtained - though we have to be careful about possible lock inversion vs. a
writer maybe?).
So it only retries quickly if a retry is requested by the fault logic.
I guess it does end up working nicely then - because if the retry can
immediately succeed with a VMA lock again then it does that, but if it can't
then it falls through to the mmap lock quickly.
(And use of vma_start_read_unlocked() would make that more reliable vs. lock
contention.)
I think there were cases where we thought that might be the case (though it then
makes you wonder why exactly the fault needs a retry?)
(This is assuming nothing in the fault path would sleep holding the VMA lock,
which I don't think can happen?).
> Nothing else needs to change then. I wonder if there is a cleaner
> way to implement the idea, but it is really stunning.
Thanks again :>) I'm not quite sure this is really all that clever, but that's
nice of you :)
>
> Best Regards
> Barry
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260804095219.46213-1-zhanghongru@xiaomi.com>
2026-08-04 12:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] mm: allow page faults to request VMA-lock retry Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-04 21:13 ` Barry Song
2026-08-05 11:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-08-06 7:29 ` Hongru Zhang
2026-08-06 8:06 ` Barry Song
2026-08-05 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] mm: allow page faults to request VMA-lock Hongru Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anMV_Kf6nqS1oKBA@lucifer \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhanghongru06@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanghongru@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox