From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Liu Jing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
david@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: fix div-by-zero in alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:52:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apiZFrc_ShBRZimV@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902144039.2824b7589e87dd185c92d67a@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:57:35 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 05:04:12PM +0800, Liu Jing wrote:
> > > In alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave(), if the iw_table contains
> > > all-zero weights for every node in the policy nodemask, weight_total
> > > sums to zero. The subsequent "rem_pages / weight_total" and
> > > "rem_pages % weight_total" trigger a divide-by-zero panic.
> > >
> >
> > weights can't be zero and we just fixed the rebind race
>
> So if the caller passes in me->weight==0 then we consider that caller
> to be buggy.
>
basically weights cannot be 0 by construction:
What: /sys/kernel/mm/mempolicy/weighted_interleave/nodeN
...
The minimum weight for a node is always 1.
What: /sys/kernel/mm/mempolicy/weighted_interleave/auto
...
If they were not previously set or are onlined with missing
bandwidth data, the weights will use a default weight of 1.
int mempolicy_set_node_perf(unsigned int node, struct access_coordinate *coords)
{
...
new_wi_state->mode_auto = true;
for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
new_wi_state->iw_table[i] = 1;
static ssize_t node_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
...
for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
new_wi_state->iw_table[i] = 1;
static ssize_t weighted_interleave_auto_store(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
...
for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
new_wi_state->iw_table[i] = 1;
we default all weights to 1 and never let calculation drop below 1 for
exactly this div/0 reason.
The div/0 risk came solely from the torn nodemask read issue.
~Gregory
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 9:04 [PATCH] mempolicy: fix div-by-zero in alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave Liu Jing
2026-09-02 13:57 ` Gregory Price
2026-09-02 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-02 21:52 ` Gregory Price [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apiZFrc_ShBRZimV@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox