From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] arm64/mm: Use pmdp_get() for PMD accesses
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:04:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asy-q5SBnrBQSadP@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lqjq64vw6mlm27kp6ffms6auerj67avecc4ongedouumsrspjh@2f2eblm7wi4u>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 08:11:52AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 04:31:28PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:52:11AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > index 763c5a411d64..9ad2d03e86ad 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > @@ -84,6 +84,12 @@ static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> > > arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#define pmdp_get pmdp_get
> > > +static inline pmd_t pmdp_get(pmd_t *pmdp)
> > > +{
> > > + return READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> > > +}
> >
> > This is the same as the generic version. Does it need redefining?
>
> Without this pmdp_get() override, replacing READ_ONCE() in pmdp_test_and_clear_young()
> with pmdp_get() causes a build failure as pmpd_get() which is defined in the generic
> pgtable header is not visible from inside platform specific pgtable header, even with
> a forward declaration.
>
> Earlier had moved pmdp_test_and_clear_young() inside arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c to avoid the
> above described dependency problem. But then realised that pmdp_get() gets eventually
> overridden on arm64 platform for D128, why not just redefine here it now as standard
> READ_ONCE() to avoid the current build problem and the code movement.
>
> Please find some context here from earlier discussions during V2.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/212067fe-1b16-4b87-87a7-4ce50847eb24@arm.com/
Thanks for link summary of the past discussion. I agree, for D128 we'll
have to define our p*d_get() but I haven't decided D128 is worth merging
yet (it depends on future hardware availability, I need to get more
visibility into this).
For the time being, I'd keep the p*d_get() accessors generic and move
pmdp_test_and_clear_young() to mmu.c.
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > > #define __HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_PMD_TLB_RANGE
> > >
> > > @@ -811,7 +817,8 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Find an entry in the third-level page table. */
> > > -#define pte_offset_phys(dir,addr) (pmd_page_paddr(READ_ONCE(*(dir))) + pte_index(addr) * sizeof(pte_t))
> > > +#define pte_offset_phys(dir, addr) (pmd_page_paddr(pmdp_get(dir)) + \
> > > + pte_index(addr) * sizeof(pte_t))
> >
> > Why not make this change in the generic version?
>
> Could you please elaborate on this ? pte_offset_phys() is arm64 specific helper which
> is also local to this header file. AFAICT there is no generic version for this helper.
You are right, I got confused.
Anyway, I'd push this series post -rc1. It depends on the mm tree and
it's getting pretty close to the merging window.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 6:22 [PATCH V3 0/4] arm64/mm: Convert pgtable READ_ONCE() as pxdp_get() Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] arm64/mm: Use pmdp_get() for PMD accesses Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 12:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-10-05 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-10-07 2:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-10-12 11:04 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2026-10-13 5:12 ` Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] arm64/mm: Use pudp_get() for PUD accesses Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 12:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] arm64/mm: Use p4dp_get() for P4D accesses Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 12:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-09-24 6:22 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] arm64/mm: Use pgdp_get() for PGD accesses Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-24 12:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-10-05 6:41 ` [PATCH V3 0/4] arm64/mm: Convert pgtable READ_ONCE() as pxdp_get() Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asy-q5SBnrBQSadP@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox