From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: page_alloc: make defrag_mode retries follow the promoted order
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 11:17:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asyzhoDeI3U4T9wZ@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010154923.998e04e42093ffe6c7c205ee@linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 03:49:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:55:02 +0100 "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Since commit 7e8756d7ad22 ("mm: page_alloc: fix non-movable reclaim
> > storm in defrag_mode"), direct reclaim and compaction for non-movable
> > requests under defrag_mode run at pageblock_order, to produce the whole
> > blocks that ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT needs. The retry decisions that follow
> > still use the request order. An order-0 request can therefore retry
> > indefinitely without ever reaching the ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT fallback:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > When a promoted request takes the fallback, reset the retry counters,
> > so that the fallback attempt gets a full retry budget before the OOM
> > killer is considered. A request whose reclaim was not promoted spent
> > its budget on the request itself and keeps its counters, as Usama Arif
> > pointed out.
>
> Thanks, I updated mm-unstable to this version.
>
> > v3:
> > - reset the retry counters at the fallback only for requests whose
> > reclaim was promoted; a movable request already spent its budget on
> > itself (Usama Arif)
>
> hannes's concerns/questions at
> https://lore.kernel.org/20261006081050.GA234057@cmpxchg.org weren't
> fully addressed? I'll add a note and await followup.
Hm. I believe they were addressed. v2 changes are based on Harry's and
Johannes feedback.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 12:55 [PATCH v3] mm: page_alloc: make defrag_mode retries follow the promoted order Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-10-09 14:05 ` Usama Arif
2026-10-10 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-12 10:17 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-10-12 11:40 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-10-13 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-13 17:37 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-10-13 18:15 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asyzhoDeI3U4T9wZ@thinkstation \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox