Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Kaitao Cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/sparse: simplify the vmemmap alignment check
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:44:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auNbTHXp4o_Dqww4@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029134521.62146-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>

On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 09:45:21PM +0800, Kaitao Cheng wrote:
> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> sparse_init() is called only once during boot, and the vmemmap alignment
> check is outside any loop, so VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() provides no benefit over
> VM_WARN_ON() here.

Okay, that's true. But who cares. __init section will be freed anyway.
I don't see downside in current code.

> Use VM_WARN_ON() and fold compound_info_has_mask() into its condition,
> preserving short-circuit evaluation.

Why? It only got harder to read, no?

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 13:45 [PATCH v2] mm/sparse: simplify the vmemmap alignment check Kaitao Cheng
2026-10-29 14:44 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-10-29 15:37   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auNbTHXp4o_Dqww4@thinkstation \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox