From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Umang Pokhriyal <umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] userfaultfd: validate the whole range before changing write protection
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 16:59:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <autISNbq0kLikxlF@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104093457.152245-1-umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 03:04:57PM +0530, Umang Pokhriyal wrote:
> mwriteprotect_range() checks each VMA as it walks the range. When a later
> VMA is not registered for write protection, or is a hugetlb VMA the range
> is not aligned to, the call fails after the earlier VMAs were already
> changed. When unprotecting, userfaultfd_writeprotect() then skips
> wake_userfault(), so threads blocked on those pages are not woken although
> the pages are writable again.
>
> An unprivileged process can trigger this with a range that spans an
> unregistered VMA. It hasn't been seen in practice; it was found while
> reviewing the userfaultfd range ioctls with an LLM.
>
> Validate the whole range first, as mrwprotect_range() already does.
>
> Fixes: a1b92a3f1498 ("mm/userfaultfd: support WP on multiple VMAs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Umang Pokhriyal <umangpokhriyall@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - drop the redundant error assignments in the validation loop (Mike)
> - drop the selftest (Mike)
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261102103621.156928-1-umangpokhriyall@gmail.com/
>
> mm/userfaultfd.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 9:34 [PATCH v2] userfaultfd: validate the whole range before changing write protection Umang Pokhriyal
2026-11-04 14:59 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=autISNbq0kLikxlF@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=umangpokhriyall@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox