From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: alternatives: Make branch and ADRP offset helpers noinst
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 19:58:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avG1a9aVNdkiiGX_@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-203636@kernel.org>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 07:43:58AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue to consider:
> - [Medium] arm64: insn: branch profiling instrumentation in noinstr
> offset helpers
> --
>
> commit b08429609214cdffaa257c9ef953b28e179973db
> Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
>
> arm64: alternatives: Make branch and ADRP offset helpers noinst
>
> This commit marks the branch and ADRP offset helpers noinstr and introduces
> __always_inline immediate encoding and decoding helpers so that
> patch_alternative() does not call instrumentable code while modifying
> instructions.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
> > index e70ac02385153..b98610fcab32e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -1299,23 +1316,23 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_gen_adr(unsigned long pc, unsigned long addr,
> > * signed value (so it can be used when computing a new branch
> > * target).
> > */
> > -s32 aarch64_get_branch_offset(u32 insn)
> > +s32 noinstr aarch64_get_branch_offset(u32 insn)
> > {
> > s32 imm;
> >
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_b(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_bl(insn)) {
> > - imm = aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26, insn);
> > + imm = __aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26, insn);
> > return (imm << 6) >> 4;
> > }
> >
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_cbz(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_cbnz(insn) ||
> > aarch64_insn_is_bcond(insn)) {
> > - imm = aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19, insn);
> > + imm = __aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19, insn);
> > return (imm << 13) >> 11;
> > }
> >
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_tbz(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_tbnz(insn)) {
> > - imm = aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14, insn);
> > + imm = __aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14, insn);
> > return (imm << 18) >> 16;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1327,35 +1344,35 @@ s32 aarch64_get_branch_offset(u32 insn)
> > * Encode the displacement of a branch in the imm field and return the
> > * updated instruction.
> > */
> > -u32 aarch64_set_branch_offset(u32 insn, s32 offset)
> > +u32 noinstr aarch64_set_branch_offset(u32 insn, s32 offset)
> > {
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_b(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_bl(insn))
> > - return aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26, insn,
> > + return __aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_26, insn,
> > offset >> 2);
> >
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_cbz(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_cbnz(insn) ||
> > aarch64_insn_is_bcond(insn))
> > - return aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19, insn,
> > + return __aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_19, insn,
> > offset >> 2);
> >
> > if (aarch64_insn_is_tbz(insn) || aarch64_insn_is_tbnz(insn))
> > - return aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14, insn,
> > + return __aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_14, insn,
> > offset >> 2);
> >
> > /* Unhandled instruction */
> > BUG();
> > }
> >
> > -s32 aarch64_insn_adrp_get_offset(u32 insn)
> > +s32 noinstr aarch64_insn_adrp_get_offset(u32 insn)
> > {
> > BUG_ON(!aarch64_insn_is_adrp(insn));
> > - return aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR, insn) << 12;
> > + return __aarch64_insn_decode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR, insn) << 12;
> > }
> >
> > -u32 aarch64_insn_adrp_set_offset(u32 insn, s32 offset)
> > +u32 noinstr aarch64_insn_adrp_set_offset(u32 insn, s32 offset)
> > {
> > BUG_ON(!aarch64_insn_is_adrp(insn));
> > - return aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR, insn,
> > + return __aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(AARCH64_INSN_IMM_ADR, insn,
> > offset >> 12);
> > }
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can these four noinstr helpers still call into ftrace_likely_update() when
> CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING is enabled?
>
> Although f22c81bebf8b ("arm64: Disable branch profiling for all arm64 code")
> added -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING to arch/arm64/Kbuild, arch/arm64/lib/ is
> built via libs-y in arch/arm64/Makefile rather than arch/arm64/Kbuild, so
> arch/arm64/lib/insn.o is compiled without DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING.
>
> As a result, the generic BUG_ON() in aarch64_insn_adrp_get_offset() and
> aarch64_insn_adrp_set_offset() expands to unlikely(), and the if statements
> in aarch64_get_branch_offset() and aarch64_set_branch_offset() are
> instrumented under CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES. When patch_alternative()
> calls these helpers while patching live instructions before cache
> maintenance completes, they call the instrumentable ftrace_likely_update().
>
> Passing -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING in arch/arm64/lib/Makefile (or defining
> DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING in arch/arm64/lib/insn.c) would prevent branch
> profiling instrumentation here.
All comments should have been addressed in v2. Plz review
Thanks very much for the comments and hints!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 7:13 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: Fix instrumentation escapes from noinstr path Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-07 7:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: percpu: Always inline helpers used by noinstr code Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-08 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 4:39 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-07 7:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: entry: Always inline helpers used by non-instrumentable paths Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-08 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 7:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: stacktrace: Always inline internal stack boundary helpers Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-07 7:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: alternatives: Make branch and ADRP offset helpers noinst Jisheng Zhang
2026-11-08 7:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 11:58 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avG1a9aVNdkiiGX_@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox