Re: [PATCH -next v5 2/4] selftests/memory-hotplug: Restore memory before exit

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 08.10.22 03:40, zhaogongyi wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>>
>> On 30.09.22 10:52, zhaogongyi wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30.09.22 08:35, Zhao Gongyi wrote:
>>>>> Some momory will be left in offline state when calling
>>>>> offline_memory_expect_fail() failed. Restore it before exit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     .../memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh         | 21
>>>> ++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>     1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh
>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh
>>>>> index 1d87611a7d52..91a7457616bb 100755
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh
>>>>> @@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ offline_memory_expect_fail()
>>>>>     	return 0
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>> +online_all_offline_memory()
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do
>>>>> +		if ! online_memory_expect_success $memory; then
>>>>> +			echo "$FUNCNAME $memory: unexpected fail" >&2
>>>>
>>>> Do we need that output?
>>>
>>> In my opinion, if online a memory node failed ,it should be a kernel bug
>> catched, so, I think the output here is needed.
>>
>> But online_memory_expect_success() already prints a warning, no?
> 
> Yes, online_memory_expect_success() already prints a warning, remove the warning in online_all_offline_memory() seems ok,
> 
> My previous consideration was that one more log information would make it easier to locate the wrong location.

Let's keep it simple unless there is real reason to warn twice.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb