linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
	cl@linux.com, hailong.liu@oppo.com, hch@infradead.org,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, mhocko@suse.com, penberg@kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	v-songbaohua@oppo.com, vbabka@suse.cz, laoar.shao@gmail.com,
	Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] vduse: avoid using __GFP_NOFAIL
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:30:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2174d62-b226-4ee3-9363-ab3c9a0b51ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtwmtSKFY2GzoNvEQzFq5wYUasf94GKqjGQKyShoqxo+A@mail.gmail.com>

On 02.09.24 09:58, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 30.08.24 22:28, Barry Song wrote:
>>> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> mm doesn't support non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL allocation. Because
>>> persisting in providing __GFP_NOFAIL services for non-block users
>>> who cannot perform direct memory reclaim may only result in an
>>> endless busy loop.
>>>
>>> Therefore, in such cases, the current mm-core may directly return
>>> a NULL pointer:
>>>
>>> static inline struct page *
>>> __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>>>                                                   struct alloc_context *ac)
>>> {
>>>           ...
>>>           if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
>>>                   /*
>>>                    * All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn
>>>                    * of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT
>>>                    */
>>>                   if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask))
>>>                           goto fail;
>>>                   ...
>>>           }
>>>           ...
>>> fail:
>>>           warn_alloc(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask,
>>>                           "page allocation failure: order:%u", order);
>>> got_pg:
>>>           return page;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Unfortuantely, vpda does that nofail allocation under non-sleepable
>>> lock. A possible way to fix that is to move the pages allocation out
>>> of the lock into the caller, but having to allocate a huge number of
>>> pages and auxiliary page array seems to be problematic as well per
>>> Tetsuon: " You should implement proper error handling instead of
>>> using __GFP_NOFAIL if count can become large."
>>>
>>> So I choose another way, which does not release kernel bounce pages
>>> when user tries to register userspace bounce pages. Then we can
>>> avoid allocating in paths where failure is not expected.(e.g in
>>> the release). We pay this for more memory usage as we don't release
>>> kernel bounce pages but further optimizations could be done on top.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6c77ed22880d ("vduse: Support using userspace pages as bounce buffer")
>>> Reviewed-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
>>> Tested-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>> [v-songbaohua@oppo.com: Refine the changelog]
>>> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>>    drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h |  1 +
>>>    2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
>>> index 791d38d6284c..58116f89d8da 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
>>> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static void vduse_domain_bounce(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
>>>                                enum dma_data_direction dir)
>>>    {
>>>        struct vduse_bounce_map *map;
>>> +     struct page *page;
>>>        unsigned int offset;
>>>        void *addr;
>>>        size_t sz;
>>> @@ -178,7 +179,10 @@ static void vduse_domain_bounce(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
>>>                            map->orig_phys == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR))
>>>                        return;
>>>
>>> -             addr = kmap_local_page(map->bounce_page);
>>> +             page = domain->user_bounce_pages ?
>>> +                    map->user_bounce_page : map->bounce_page;
>>> +
>>> +             addr = kmap_local_page(page);
>>>                do_bounce(map->orig_phys + offset, addr + offset, sz, dir);
>>>                kunmap_local(addr);
>>>                size -= sz;
>>> @@ -270,9 +274,8 @@ int vduse_domain_add_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
>>>                                memcpy_to_page(pages[i], 0,
>>>                                               page_address(map->bounce_page),
>>>                                               PAGE_SIZE);
>>> -                     __free_page(map->bounce_page);
>>>                }
>>> -             map->bounce_page = pages[i];
>>> +             map->user_bounce_page = pages[i];
>>>                get_page(pages[i]);
>>>        }
>>>        domain->user_bounce_pages = true;
>>> @@ -297,17 +300,17 @@ void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain)
>>>                struct page *page = NULL;
>>>
>>>                map = &domain->bounce_maps[i];
>>> -             if (WARN_ON(!map->bounce_page))
>>> +             if (WARN_ON(!map->user_bounce_page))
>>>                        continue;
>>>
>>>                /* Copy user page to kernel page if it's in use */
>>>                if (map->orig_phys != INVALID_PHYS_ADDR) {
>>> -                     page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>>> +                     page = map->bounce_page;
>>
>> Why don't we need a kmap_local_page(map->bounce_page) here, but we might
>> perform one / have performed one in vduse_domain_bounce?
> 
> I think it's another bug that needs to be fixed.
> 
> Yongji, do you want to fix this?

Or maybe it works because "map->bounce_page" is now always a kernel 
page, and never one from user space that might reside in highmem.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-02  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-30 20:28 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/vdpa: correct misuse of non-direct-reclaim __GFP_NOFAIL and improve related doc and warn Barry Song
2024-08-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vduse: avoid using __GFP_NOFAIL Barry Song
2024-09-02  7:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-02  7:58     ` Jason Wang
2024-09-02  8:30       ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-03  0:35         ` Jason Wang
2024-08-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: document __GFP_NOFAIL must be blockable Barry Song
2024-09-02  7:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-30 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm: warn about illegal __GFP_NOFAIL usage in a more appropriate location and manner Barry Song
2024-09-01 20:18   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-02  3:23   ` Yafang Shao
2024-09-02  4:00     ` Barry Song
2024-09-02  5:47       ` Yafang Shao
2024-09-02  7:40   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-02  7:58   ` Michal Hocko
2024-09-03 22:39     ` Barry Song
2024-09-04  7:22       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2174d62-b226-4ee3-9363-ab3c9a0b51ca@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=hailong.liu@oppo.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).