public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: alexghiti@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	akinobu.mita@gmail.com, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, axelrasmussen@google.com,
	yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	apopple@nvidia.com, byungchul@sk.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, rakie.kim@sk.com,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: Move demotion related functions in memory-tiers.c
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:14:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2543019-5489-4968-be77-226e356b855c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311110314.237315-2-alex@ghiti.fr>


Hi Alexander

On 3/11/26 4:32 PM, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> Let's have all the demotion functions in this file, no functional
> change intended.
>
> Suggested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
> ---
>   include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 18 ++++++++
>   mm/memory-tiers.c            | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   mm/vmscan.c                  | 80 +-----------------------------------
>   3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index 96987d9d95a8..0bf0d002939e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ void mt_put_memory_types(struct list_head *memory_types);
>   int next_demotion_node(int node, const nodemask_t *allowed_mask);
>   void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
>   bool node_is_toptier(int node);
> +unsigned int mt_demote_folios(struct list_head *demote_folios,
> +			      struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +			      struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>   #else
>   static inline int next_demotion_node(int node, const nodemask_t *allowed_mask)
>   {
> @@ -71,6 +74,14 @@ static inline bool node_is_toptier(int node)
>   {
>   	return true;
>   }
> +
> +static inline unsigned int mt_demote_folios(struct list_head *demote_folios,
> +					    struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +					    struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   #endif
>   
>   #else
> @@ -116,6 +127,13 @@ static inline bool node_is_toptier(int node)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static inline unsigned int mt_demote_folios(struct list_head *demote_folios,
> +					    struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +					    struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static inline int register_mt_adistance_algorithm(struct notifier_block *nb)
>   {
>   	return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 986f809376eb..afdf21738a54 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
>   #include <linux/notifier.h>
>   #include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
> +#include <linux/migrate.h>
>   
>   #include "internal.h"
>   
> @@ -373,6 +374,80 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node, const nodemask_t *allowed_mask)
>   	return find_next_best_node(node, &mask);
>   }
>   
> +static struct folio *alloc_demote_folio(struct folio *src,
> +					unsigned long private)
> +{
> +	struct folio *dst;
> +	nodemask_t *allowed_mask;
> +	struct migration_target_control *mtc;
> +
> +	mtc = (struct migration_target_control *)private;
> +
> +	allowed_mask = mtc->nmask;
> +	/*
> +	 * make sure we allocate from the target node first also trying to
> +	 * demote or reclaim pages from the target node via kswapd if we are
> +	 * low on free memory on target node. If we don't do this and if
> +	 * we have free memory on the slower(lower) memtier, we would start
> +	 * allocating pages from slower(lower) memory tiers without even forcing
> +	 * a demotion of cold pages from the target memtier. This can result
> +	 * in the kernel placing hot pages in slower(lower) memory tiers.
> +	 */
> +	mtc->nmask = NULL;
> +	mtc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_THISNODE;
> +	dst = alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
> +	if (dst)
> +		return dst;
> +
> +	mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
> +	mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
> +
> +	return alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned int mt_demote_folios(struct list_head *demote_folios,


Demotion will happen only when different memory tiers are present, 
right? Since demote_folios() already implies that the folios are being 
demoted to a lower tier, is the mt_ prefix needed in the function name? 
I’m fine with keeping it as is, but I just wanted to clarify.

Otherwise it LGTM

Reviewed by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>

> +			      struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +			      struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> +	int target_nid;
> +	unsigned int nr_succeeded;
> +	nodemask_t allowed_mask;
> +
> +	struct migration_target_control mtc = {
> +		/*
> +		 * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly.
> +		 * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded
> +		 * instead of migrated.
> +		 */
> +		.gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) |
> +			__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
> +		.nmask = &allowed_mask,
> +		.reason = MR_DEMOTION,
> +	};
> +
> +	if (list_empty(demote_folios))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask);
> +	mem_cgroup_node_filter_allowed(memcg, &allowed_mask);
> +	if (nodes_empty(allowed_mask))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	target_nid = next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id, &allowed_mask);
> +	if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		/* No lower-tier nodes or nodes were hot-unplugged. */
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mtc.nid = target_nid;
> +
> +	/* Demotion ignores all cpuset and mempolicy settings */
> +	migrate_pages(demote_folios, alloc_demote_folio, NULL,
> +			(unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION,
> +			&nr_succeeded);
> +
> +	return nr_succeeded;
> +}
> +
>   static void disable_all_demotion_targets(void)
>   {
>   	struct memory_tier *memtier;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 0fc9373e8251..5e0138b94480 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -983,84 +983,6 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio,
>   		mapping->a_ops->is_dirty_writeback(folio, dirty, writeback);
>   }
>   
> -static struct folio *alloc_demote_folio(struct folio *src,
> -		unsigned long private)
> -{
> -	struct folio *dst;
> -	nodemask_t *allowed_mask;
> -	struct migration_target_control *mtc;
> -
> -	mtc = (struct migration_target_control *)private;
> -
> -	allowed_mask = mtc->nmask;
> -	/*
> -	 * make sure we allocate from the target node first also trying to
> -	 * demote or reclaim pages from the target node via kswapd if we are
> -	 * low on free memory on target node. If we don't do this and if
> -	 * we have free memory on the slower(lower) memtier, we would start
> -	 * allocating pages from slower(lower) memory tiers without even forcing
> -	 * a demotion of cold pages from the target memtier. This can result
> -	 * in the kernel placing hot pages in slower(lower) memory tiers.
> -	 */
> -	mtc->nmask = NULL;
> -	mtc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_THISNODE;
> -	dst = alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
> -	if (dst)
> -		return dst;
> -
> -	mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
> -	mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
> -
> -	return alloc_migration_target(src, (unsigned long)mtc);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Take folios on @demote_folios and attempt to demote them to another node.
> - * Folios which are not demoted are left on @demote_folios.
> - */
> -static unsigned int demote_folio_list(struct list_head *demote_folios,
> -				      struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> -				      struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> -{
> -	int target_nid;
> -	unsigned int nr_succeeded;
> -	nodemask_t allowed_mask;
> -
> -	struct migration_target_control mtc = {
> -		/*
> -		 * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly.
> -		 * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded
> -		 * instead of migrated.
> -		 */
> -		.gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) |
> -			__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
> -		.nmask = &allowed_mask,
> -		.reason = MR_DEMOTION,
> -	};
> -
> -	if (list_empty(demote_folios))
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask);
> -	mem_cgroup_node_filter_allowed(memcg, &allowed_mask);
> -	if (nodes_empty(allowed_mask))
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	target_nid = next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id, &allowed_mask);
> -	if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> -		/* No lower-tier nodes or nodes were hot-unplugged. */
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	mtc.nid = target_nid;
> -
> -	/* Demotion ignores all cpuset and mempolicy settings */
> -	migrate_pages(demote_folios, alloc_demote_folio, NULL,
> -		      (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION,
> -		      &nr_succeeded);
> -
> -	return nr_succeeded;
> -}
> -
>   static bool may_enter_fs(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>   {
>   	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
> @@ -1573,7 +1495,7 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
>   	/* 'folio_list' is always empty here */
>   
>   	/* Migrate folios selected for demotion */
> -	nr_demoted = demote_folio_list(&demote_folios, pgdat, memcg);
> +	nr_demoted = mt_demote_folios(&demote_folios, pgdat, memcg);
>   	nr_reclaimed += nr_demoted;
>   	stat->nr_demoted += nr_demoted;
>   	/* Folios that could not be demoted are still in @demote_folios */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 11:02 [PATCH 0/4] Demotion cleanup and fixes Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Move demotion related functions in memory-tiers.c Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 14:55   ` Joshua Hahn
2026-03-13 13:33     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-12  8:44   ` Donet Tom [this message]
2026-03-13 13:27     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-12 12:56   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-13 13:45     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: Rename node_get_allowed_targets() to make it more explicit Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 15:02   ` Joshua Hahn
2026-03-12  5:28   ` Byungchul Park
2026-03-12 12:58     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-13 13:46       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-12  8:46   ` Donet Tom
2026-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: Fix demotion gfp by clearing GFP_RECLAIM after setting GFP_TRANSHUGE Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 17:06   ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-12 12:59     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-13 13:47     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 17:54   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-12 16:01     ` Gregory Price
2026-03-13 13:49     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2026-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: Fix demotion gfp by preserving initial gfp reclaim policy Alexandre Ghiti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2543019-5489-4968-be77-226e356b855c@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alexghiti@kernel.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox