From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/14] mm/zsmalloc: replace PG_private with pointer comparison
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 13:05:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f03eba-02ed-4763-86af-cafc23e0006f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DKE0CO9RE3TN.KYL8VQE6QW66@nvidia.com>
On 02/08/2026 00:49, Zi Yan wrote:
> On Sat Aug 1, 2026 at 10:12 AM EDT, Usama Arif wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 22:13:24 -0400 Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> zsmalloc uses PG_private to indicate first zpdesc in the zspage chain.
>>> Replace it with zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc. The check,
>>> is_first_zpdesc(), is only used in VM_BUG_ON(), so performance impact
>>> should be negligible.
>>>
>>> It prepares for a future commit that remove PG_private.
>>>
>>> No functional change intended.
>>>
>>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>>> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
>>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>>> To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
>>> To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
>>> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> mm/zpdesc.h | 2 +-
>>> mm/zsmalloc.c | 15 +++------------
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> create_page_chain() sets zpdesc->zspage = zspage before assigning zspage->first_zpdesc,
>> so LGTM.
>>
>> I think the assertion in get_first_zpdesc()
>> should be changed to
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(first_zpdesc->zspage != zspage, zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
>>
>> in the current check, we are checking
>>
>> zspage->first_zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zspage->first_zpdesc
>>
>> which is just testing the backpointer.
>
> Got it. Thank you for pointing this out.
>
> is_first_zpdesc() is also used in obj_allocated() for the same check and
> getting rid of it in get_first_zpdesc() causes inconsistency.
>
> How about the changes below on top of this patch? is_first_zpdesc() can
> be used for both sites and looks cleaner. And VM_BUG_ON_PAGE is replaced
> with VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE.
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index e8ef227624efa..f021d2df99404 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -471,9 +471,10 @@ static void record_obj(unsigned long handle, unsigned long obj)
> WRITE_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)handle, obj);
> }
>
> -static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> +static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
> + struct zspage *zspage)
> {
> - return zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc;
> + return zpdesc->zspage == zspage && zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc;
> }
>
> /* Protected by class->lock */
> @@ -491,7 +492,7 @@ static struct zpdesc *get_first_zpdesc(struct zspage *zspage)
> {
> struct zpdesc *first_zpdesc = zspage->first_zpdesc;
>
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc, zspage), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
mhmm do you mean
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc, zspage), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
here? ! is missing I think?
> return first_zpdesc;
> }
>
> @@ -828,7 +829,7 @@ static inline bool obj_allocated(struct zpdesc *zpdesc, void *obj,
> struct zspage *zspage = get_zspage(zpdesc);
>
> if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage))) {
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(zpdesc), zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(is_first_zpdesc(zpdesc, zspage), zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
same here? ! is missing?
> handle = zpdesc->handle;
> } else
> handle = *(unsigned long *)obj;
>
>>
>> With the above VM_BUG_ON check change, please feel free to add:
>>
>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
>>> index b8258dc78548d..4fd81c2e80769 100644
>>> --- a/mm/zpdesc.h
>>> +++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
>>> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
>>> * with memcg_data.
>>> *
>>> * Page flags used:
>>> - * * PG_private identifies the first component page.
>>> * * PG_locked is used by page migration code.
>>> + * The first component page has zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc
>>> */
>>> struct zpdesc {
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>>> index 8204b76f78308..e8ef227624efa 100644
>>> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
>>> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>>> @@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ struct zs_pool {
>>> atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>> -{
>>> - SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>> {
>>> inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
>>> @@ -478,7 +473,7 @@ static void record_obj(unsigned long handle, unsigned long obj)
>>>
>>> static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>> {
>>> - return PagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>>> + return zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Protected by class->lock */
>>> @@ -848,9 +843,6 @@ static inline bool obj_allocated(struct zpdesc *zpdesc, void *obj,
>>>
>>> static void reset_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>> {
>>> - struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
>>> -
>>> - ClearPagePrivate(page);
>>> zpdesc->zspage = NULL;
>>> zpdesc->next = NULL;
>>> /* PageZsmalloc is sticky until the page is freed to the buddy. */
>>> @@ -1001,8 +993,8 @@ static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
>>> * 1. all pages are linked together using zpdesc->next
>>> * 2. each sub-page point to zspage using zpdesc->zspage
>>> *
>>> - * we set PG_private to identify the first zpdesc (i.e. no other zpdesc
>>> - * has this flag set).
>>> + * The first zpdesc has its zspage->first_zpdesc set to itself, no
>>> + * other zpdesc has this set.
>>> */
>>> for (i = 0; i < nr_zpdescs; i++) {
>>> zpdesc = zpdescs[i];
>>> @@ -1010,7 +1002,6 @@ static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
>>> zpdesc->next = NULL;
>>> if (i == 0) {
>>> zspage->first_zpdesc = zpdesc;
>>> - zpdesc_set_first(zpdesc);
>>> if (unlikely(class->objs_per_zspage == 1 &&
>>> class->pages_per_zspage == 1))
>>> SetZsHugePage(zspage);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.53.0
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 2:13 [PATCH RFC 00/14] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 01/14] mm/zsmalloc: replace PG_private with pointer comparison Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:12 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-01 23:49 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-02 12:05 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 02/14] perf/ring_buffer: stop using PG_private as AUX page high-order marker Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:32 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02 1:20 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 03/14] xen/grant-table: stop setting PG_private on pages for grant mapping Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:42 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02 1:24 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 04/14] fs/crypto: stop setting PG_private on bounce page Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:52 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02 1:29 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 05/14] mm/hugetlb: use direct assignment instead of folio_change_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-02 12:16 ` Usama Arif
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 06/14] fs/f2fs: stop using PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 07/14] fs/erofs: mm/pagemap: add readahead_folio_reverse() to avoid folio->private Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 08/14] fs/erofs: use folio_attach/detach_private() instead of direct assignment Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 09/14] mm/page-flags: check page/folio->private instead of PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 10/14] mm/page-flags: introduce folio_test_fs_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 11/14] treewide: remove folio_set/clear_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 12/14] treewide: replace PagePrivate() with page_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 13/14] treewide: adjust comments on PagePrivate and PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-01 2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 14/14] mm/page-flags: remove PG_private Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3f03eba-02ed-4763-86af-cafc23e0006f@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox