From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
To: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
"ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>,
"idryomov@gmail.com" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam.Howlett@oracle.com" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"surenb@google.com" <surenb@google.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"kees@kernel.org" <kees@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mhocko@suse.com" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched, fork: Wire BLOG contexts into task lifecycle
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:57:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b46130d7e9232b3163db4299fdd09f73668f059a.camel@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024084259.2359693-2-amarkuze@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 08:42 +0000, Alex Markuze wrote:
> Extend struct task_struct with a blog_contexts array to hold per-module
> BLOG TLS pointers. Each task may have up to BLOG_MAX_MODULES (currently 8)
> distinct logging contexts, allowing multiple subsystems to attach binary
> loggers without interference.
>
> The fork path (copy_process) initializes blog_contexts to NULL for new
> tasks, ensuring clean initial state. The exit path (do_exit) calls
> blog_tls_clear_task() to release any active contexts before task teardown,
> ensuring contexts are properly recycled to the magazine pool and preventing
> use-after-free scenarios.
>
> These changes are conditional on CONFIG_BLOG. Kernels built without BLOG
> support incur no storage or runtime overhead in task_struct.
>
> This commit establishes the foundation for per-task binary logging contexts
> but does not activate any logging functionality. The BLOG subsystem itself
> is introduced in subsequent commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++++
> kernel/fork.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 07576479c0ed..e381f8421a11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1278,6 +1278,13 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* Journalling filesystem info: */
> void *journal_info;
>
> +/* BLOG support - max modules defined here for use by other headers */
> +#define BLOG_MAX_MODULES 8
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOG
> + struct blog_tls_ctx *blog_contexts[BLOG_MAX_MODULES];
> +#endif
> +
> /* Stacked block device info: */
> struct bio_list *bio_list;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 3da0f08615a9..b06843af05a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> #include <linux/sched/cputime.h>
> #include <linux/sched/ext.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOG
> +#include <linux/blog/blog.h>
> +#endif
> #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/unistd.h>
> @@ -186,6 +189,29 @@ static inline struct task_struct *alloc_task_struct_node(int node)
>
> static inline void free_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOG
> + /* Clean up any BLOG contexts */
> + {
> + struct blog_tls_ctx *contexts[BLOG_MAX_MODULES];
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Step 1: Atomically detach all contexts while holding lock */
> + task_lock(tsk);
> + for (i = 0; i < BLOG_MAX_MODULES; i++) {
> + contexts[i] = tsk->blog_contexts[i];
> + tsk->blog_contexts[i] = NULL;
> + }
> + task_unlock(tsk);
> +
> + /* Step 2: Release contexts outside the lock */
> + for (i = 0; i < BLOG_MAX_MODULES; i++) {
> + struct blog_tls_ctx *ctx = contexts[i];
> +
> + if (ctx && ctx->release)
> + ctx->release(ctx);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
It looks like a function that can hide this CONFIG_BLOG declarations. What's
about to introduce the function for this logic?
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOG
static inline void free_blog_context()
{
<logic is here>
}
#else
static inline void free_blog_context() {}
#endif
> kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep, tsk);
> }
>
> @@ -2012,6 +2038,17 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> p = dup_task_struct(current, node);
> if (!p)
> goto fork_out;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOG
> + /* Initialize BLOG contexts */
> + {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < BLOG_MAX_MODULES; i++)
> + p->blog_contexts[i] = NULL;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
The same here. What's about to introduce the function for this logic?
By the way, could memset() be used here instead of loop?
Thanks,
Slava.
> p->flags &= ~PF_KTHREAD;
> if (args->kthread)
> p->flags |= PF_KTHREAD;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 8:42 [RFC PATCH 0/5] BLOG: per-task logging contexts with Ceph consumer Alex Markuze
2025-10-24 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched, fork: Wire BLOG contexts into task lifecycle Alex Markuze
2025-10-24 17:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-29 18:57 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2025-10-24 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] lib: Introduce BLOG (Binary LOGging) subsystem Alex Markuze
2025-10-30 18:47 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-10-24 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] ceph: Add BLOG scaffolding Alex Markuze
2025-11-03 22:37 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-10-24 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] ceph: Add BLOG debugfs support Alex Markuze
2025-11-03 21:07 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-10-24 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] ceph: Activate BLOG logging Alex Markuze
2025-11-03 21:00 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-10-24 15:32 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] BLOG: per-task logging contexts with Ceph consumer David Hildenbrand
2025-10-24 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-25 10:50 ` Alex Markuze
2025-10-25 14:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-25 17:54 ` Alex Markuze
2025-10-27 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-28 17:07 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b46130d7e9232b3163db4299fdd09f73668f059a.camel@ibm.com \
--to=slava.dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).