From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f199.google.com (mail-wr0-f199.google.com [209.85.128.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6664B6B0038 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f199.google.com with SMTP id u108so12994387wrb.3 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 130si2751608wmf.4.2017.03.17.03.47.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id x124so2593328wmf.3 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 03:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages References: <148846752022.2349.13667498174822419498.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <148846771545.2349.9373586041426414252.stgit@brijesh-build-machine> <20170310110657.hophlog2juw5hpzz@pd.tnic> <20170316182836.tyvxoeq56thtc4pd@pd.tnic> <20170317101737.icdois7sdmtutt6b@pd.tnic> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:47:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170317101737.icdois7sdmtutt6b@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brijesh Singh , simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, dyoung@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org, arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@kernel.org On 17/03/2017 11:17, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> I also don't really like the patch as is (plus it fails modpost), but >> IMO reusing __change_page_attr and __split_large_page is the right thing >> to do. > > Right, so teaching pageattr.c about memblock could theoretically come > around and bite us later when a page allocated with memblock gets freed > with free_page(). Theoretically or practically? > And looking at this more, we have all this kernel pagetable preparation > code down the init_mem_mapping() call and the pagetable setup in > arch/x86/mm/init_{32,64}.c It only looks at the E820 map, doesn't it? Why does it have to do anything with percpu memory areas? Paolo > And that code even does some basic page splitting. Oh and it uses > alloc_low_pages() which knows whether to do memblock reservation or the > common __get_free_pages() when slabs are up. > > So what would be much cleaner, IMHO, is if one would reuse that code to > change init_mm.pgd mappings early without copying pageattr.c. > > init_mem_mapping() gets called before kvm_guest_init() in setup_arch() > so the guest would simply fixup its pagetable right there. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org